UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Codifying and Commodifying Nature: Narratives on Forest Property Rights and the Implementation of Tenure Regularization Policies in Northwestern Argentina

Identification

Clé publique

doi:10.48350/162903

Auteurs

Inguaggiato, Carla · Ceddia, Michele Graziano · Tschopp, Maurice Nicolas · Christopoulos, Dimitris

Année déclarée

2021

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

JournalArticle

Première détection

2026-11-09T19:18:59.930912+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-09T19:18:59.930912+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

University of Bern - Center for Development and Environment

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

Environmental resource management requires negotiation among state and non-state actors with conflicting goals and different levels of influence. In northwestern Argentina, forest policy implementation is described as weak, due to governance structure and ambiguities in the law. We studied how policy actors’ attitudes and their positions in the forest governance network relate to the implementation of land tenure regularization in a context where land tenure regularization is at the core of struggles over environmental policies. We focused on the Chaco Salteño part of the Gran Chaco ecosystem, one of the world’s major deforestation frontiers. We argue that the presence of weak advocacy coalitions requires an analysis of agency to understand this policy process. Our policy network analysis revealed a lack of clear contrasting factions, due to a core–periphery structure. The core of the network brings together all core beliefs but not all of the most influential actors. Assessing network centrality and reputational influence enabled us to identify actors with exceptional agency. We contribute to the debates on advocacy coalitions and on land tenure by distinguishing between attitudes toward tenure regularization policies and their actual implementation in a context where actors have diverging interests and objectives.

Identifiants

DOI

10.48350/162903

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Doctrine

Types déclarés par les sources

JournalArticle

Juridictions étudiées — sources explicites

AR

Entités naturelles mentionnées

Forêt · Écosystème

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

DataCite · Document 1 · Document 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.48350/162903
• Document · https://boris-portal.unibe.ch/entities/publication/48adcad4-12b2-4038-ac1d-ef466eb19c4e

Statut documentaire

Hors périmètre juridique après examen

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.