UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Cumplimiento de amparos ambientales en México: estándares de ejecución: Compliance with Environmental Injunctions Judgments in Mexico: Enforcement Standards

Identification

Clé publique

radar:r-7c246e230ee0f1f59c2f69435595a6b4

Auteurs

Juan Pablo Ramírez Navarrete · Leonel Cásares García · Jorge Abelardo Adame Ávila

Année déclarée

2026

Langue déclarée

es

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-13T12:39:24.995753+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-13T12:39:24.995753+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

This article examines why environmental amparo judgments imposing obligations to act face protracted or incomplete compliance in Mexico, and identifies which enforcement parameters foster tangible results. Its objective is to propose minimum enforcement standards — financial, temporal, and inter-institutional — that can be embedded in the operative part of environmental rulings to render judicial protection effective. The research adopts a doctrinal-hermeneutic approach combined with a comparative study of three landmark cases: Ríos Atoyac-Salado (Amparo 621/2016), San Andrés Mixquic (Amparo en Revisión 641/2017), and Acuífero de la Región Lagunera (Amparo en Revisión 543/2022), contrasted through an analytical matrix recording order design, monitoring mechanisms, alleged obstacles, and compliance status. Results show that judgments incorporating a joint program with goals and responsible parties, a milestone-based timeline, a scheduled financing scheme, periodic public reporting, and active judicial oversight are significantly more likely to achieve effective ecological restoration. The originality of this work lies in shifting the debate from the justiciability of environmental rights toward the operational design of the ruling, proposing a seven-component protocol directly applicable by courts and tribunals. The article concludes that, without enforcement mechanisms structured from within the judgment itself, judicial protection becomes illusory and in-kind restoration remains an abstract declaration. The study is limited to Mexican federal judgments from the 2017–2023 period that impose obligations to act; its conclusions are therefore not directly transferable to other jurisdictions or to monetary-relief rulings.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

https://openalex.org/W7215089785

DOI

10.5281/zenodo.19938835

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

article

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1

• Document · https://revistas.uas.edu.mx/index.php/index/article/view/1732

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.