UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Reply to Bridgewater (2021), ‘Response to Davies et al., ‘Towards a Universal Declaration of the Rights of Wetlands’’

Identification

Clé publique

doi:10.1071/mf21132

Auteurs

Gillian T. Davies · C. Max Finlayson · Erin Okuno · Nicholas C. Davidson · Royal C. Gardner · William R. Moomaw · Dave Pritchard

Année déclarée

2021

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

letter

Première détection

2026-11-09T19:04:47.663229+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-09T19:11:06.538154+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

Charles Sturt University · IHE Delft Institute for Water Education · Stetson University · Tufts University · UNSW Sydney

Pays d’affiliation déclarés

AU · NL · US

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

We reply to the main concerns raised by Bridgewater (2021) in his response to Davies et al. (2021a), ‘Towards a Universal Declaration of the Rights of Wetlands’. We appreciate the contribution of Bridgewater (2021) to this emerging conversation and, although we disagree with some of his assessments and statements, we do not find his points to be incompatible with support for the Declaration of the Rights of Wetlands (ROW). This reply focuses on four areas of concern raised by Bridgewater (2021). First, we describe why a wetlands-specific declaration will add important value to other Rights of Nature declarations. Second, we discuss how the ROW does not detract from, but rather can contribute to and complement, existing conservation and management approaches and mechanisms. Third, we agree on the importance of weaving Indigenous and local knowledge with other knowledges and emphasise that the ROW should not be confused with or misused to undermine the rights of Indigenous peoples and local communities. Finally, we explain how legal rights can and have been granted to non-humans, including elements of Nature, such as wetlands.

Identifiants

DOI

10.1071/mf21132

OPENALEX

W3201263930

OPENAIRE

doi_dedup___::72688d1038c914cc353225fa8cd0f52e

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Autre

Types déclarés par les sources

Article · letter

Entités naturelles mentionnées

Zone humide

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAIRE · Document 1

OpenAlex · Document 1 · Document 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.1071/mf21132
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W3201263930

Relations bibliographiques documentées

Références et liens déclarés par les sources ; ils ne constituent pas une preuve juridique ni une qualification UGLC. Affichage limité à 20 références sortantes.

• openalex:w2123781531 · CITES
• Valuing nature’s contributions to people: the IPBES approach · CITES
• openalex:w2752443224 · CITES
• openalex:w2769601300 · CITES
• openalex:w2795971879 · CITES
• Juristic personhood for sacred natural sites: A potential means for protecting nature · CITES
• openalex:w2887816051 · CITES
• openalex:w2901486315 · CITES
• On the problem of the justification of river rights · CITES
• openalex:w2988891927 · CITES
• Sustainability and the Rights of Nature in Practice · CITES
• openalex:w2996645988 · CITES
• openalex:w3000749495 · CITES
• openalex:w3015530812 · CITES
• openalex:w3046499815 · CITES
• Stop Burying the Lede: The Essential Role of Indigenous Law(s) in Creating Rights of Nature · CITES
• Towards a Universal Declaration of the Rights of Wetlands · CITES
• openalex:w3119209496 · CITES
• openalex:w3128121822 · CITES
• The extinction of rights and the extantion of ghehds · CITES

3 références entrantes au sein du corpus détecté

Statut documentaire

Intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique

Bibliothèque