UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

The ‘rights of nature’ in an age of white supremacy?

Identification

Clé publique

doi:10.1177/23996544231164508

Auteurs

Erin

Année déclarée

2023

Langue déclarée

en · eng

Type source

Article

Première détection

2026-11-09T19:04:47.866739+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-10T16:58:51.263801+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

The University of Melbourne

Pays d’affiliation déclarés

AU

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

The past 10 years have witnessed a flourishing of interdisciplinary research across the social sciences that aims to better theorize the relationships between structural racism and the deepening ecological crisis. In this article, I consider how grassroots lawyers and community activists for the ‘rights of nature’ (RoN) in the United States are transforming their discourses, legal tactics, and pedagogical strategies in the face of a national context marked by pervasive anti-Black racism. After considering how racism has historically accompanied efforts to extend moral and legal ‘personhood’ to ecosystems in ways that continue to make solidarity work with racial justice organizations vexed and difficult, I show that, despite these exclusionary legacies, RoN activists are experimenting with municipal law-making in ways that are bringing them into closer conversation with contemporary racial justice struggles. Instead of focusing narrowly on the problem of the denial of ‘rights’ to non-humans, RoN activists are increasingly concerned with the broader structural problem of state pre-emption over local decision-making and the profoundly anti-democratic nature of a state/corporate nexus that is limiting possibilities for progressive action across a wide range of justice issues. Whilst these legal experiments do not resolve enduring tensions between anti-racist and environmental struggles, they suggest important re-directions taking place among historically white environmental activists.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

W4377088528

DOI

10.1177/23996544231164508

OPENAIRE

doi_________::c17687d9e8fb8d51a7fa27c42fe6987b

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Doctrine

Types déclarés par les sources

Article · article

Entités naturelles mentionnées

Écosystème

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAIRE · Document 1

OpenAlex · Document 1 · Document 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.1177/23996544231164508
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W4377088528

Relations bibliographiques documentées

Références et liens déclarés par les sources ; ils ne constituent pas une preuve juridique ni une qualification UGLC. Affichage limité à 20 références sortantes.

• openalex:w2051421761 · CITES
• Should trees have standing? Law, morality, and the environment · CITES
• openalex:w2096012443 · CITES
• Imagining Corporate Personhood · CITES
• openalex:w2324274005 · CITES
• Nature Advocacy and the Indigenous Symbol · CITES
• openalex:w2336822056 · CITES
• openalex:w2339983425 · CITES
• openalex:w2342514655 · CITES
• openalex:w2342655129 · CITES
• openalex:w2580715104 · CITES
• openalex:w2779190168 · CITES
• Creating legal rights for rivers: Lessons from Australia, New Zealand, and India · CITES
• Developing deeply intersectional environmental justice scholarship · CITES
• Producing juridical knowledge: “Rights of Nature” or the naturalization of rights? · CITES
• Challenging Corporate “Personhood”: Energy Companies and the “Rights” of Non‐Humans · CITES
• Constructing Rights of Nature Norms in the US, Ecuador, and New Zealand · CITES
• openalex:w2900621324 · CITES
• openalex:w2904519652 · CITES
• openalex:w2909893027 · CITES

5 références entrantes au sein du corpus détecté

Statut documentaire

Publication académique détectée

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.