UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Incitement to Suicide in the Digital Age: A Comparative Legal Study of Criminal Liability

Identification

Clé publique

radar:r-7400c3bef5b2ebb413c305a233aed412

Auteurs

Dalia Kadry Ahmed Abdelaziz

Année déclarée

2025

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-13T12:50:15.247145+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-13T12:50:15.247145+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

Prince Sultan University

Pays d’affiliation déclarés

SA

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

From a comparative legal point of view, the research focuses on incitement to suicide in contemporary times, noting the challenges that modern technologies and social media platforms bring. The study poses a key question about the adequacy of national and international laws in tackling the phenomenon of digital incitement to suicide and establishing the criminal responsibility of perpetrators and digital companies. The study uses analytical and comparative methods by analyzing the legal systems of some countries (for instance, Saudi Arabia and France) and international treaties like the Budapest Convention. It also analyzes the extent to which digital platforms and artificial intelligence algorithms are either enabling the spread of these crimes or helping to counter them. The results point out the lack of laws against digital incitement to suicide — and most prominently, how to hold digital companies responsible. The report concluded that international cooperation should be strengthened to create unified legislation, while technical tools should be developed to reduce incitement through digital platforms. It also calls for national legislation to be updated to meet the digital challenges of today (Council of Europe, 2001). This ongoing research seeks to contribute to the legal literature around this issue by providing insights and recommendations for policymakers and legislatures on how to better support prevention and accountability in this area.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

https://openalex.org/W4410782745

DOI

10.63332/joph.v5i6.2105

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

article

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1

• Document · https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i6.2105

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.