UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Reconstructing Individual Rights and Social Obligations in Islamic Family Law

Identification

Clé publique

doi:10.24252/mazahibuna.vi.68674

Auteurs

Yusri Muhammad Arsyad · Subaedah · Muhammad Rusli · Muhammad Al-Razqi

Année déclarée

2026

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-09T19:04:47.956192+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-09T19:04:47.956192+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

Ez-Zitouna University · Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Pays d’affiliation déclarés

ID · TN

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

Contemporary Islamic family law faces growing tensions between the protection of individual rights and the preservation of social obligations amid the expansion of liberal individualism and changing family structures. Although numerous studies have examined ḥadīth al-aḥkām from textual and socio-legal perspectives, limited attention has been given to how different Islamic madhhabs derive legal rulings from these traditions to address contemporary family issues. This study analyses the comparative legal reasoning of the four major Sunni madhhabs regarding the balance between individual rights and collective responsibilities in Islamic family law. Employing qualitative library research, it combines thematic (mawḍū‘ī) analysis of selected ḥadīth al-aḥkām from the Kutub al-Sittah with comparative madhhab analysis based on the uṣūl al-fiqh methodologies of the Ḥanafī, Mālikī, Shāfiʿī, and Ḥanbalī madhhabs. The findings indicate that while all madhhabs regard the family as the primary institution for safeguarding justice and social welfare, they differ in defining the scope of individual autonomy, legal authority, and reciprocal obligations according to their respective juristic methodologies. These differences represent methodological diversity rather than normative contradiction and provide flexible legal responses to contemporary family challenges. This study contributes to comparative madhhab scholarship by demonstrating the continuing relevance of classical juristic reasoning in the reform and development of contemporary Islamic family law.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

W7208742630

DOI

10.24252/mazahibuna.vi.68674

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Doctrine

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1 · Document 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.24252/mazahibuna.vi.68674
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W7208742630

Relations bibliographiques documentées

Références et liens déclarés par les sources ; ils ne constituent pas une preuve juridique ni une qualification UGLC. Affichage limité à 20 références sortantes.

• openalex:w2906909830 · CITES
• openalex:w2919856718 · CITES
• openalex:w3023714287 · CITES
• openalex:w3048893116 · CITES
• openalex:w3188029122 · CITES
• openalex:w4225557544 · CITES
• openalex:w4310026374 · CITES
• openalex:w4382774897 · CITES
• openalex:w4382790995 · CITES
• openalex:w4388798653 · CITES
• openalex:w4389564705 · CITES
• openalex:w4390827489 · CITES
• openalex:w4392878953 · CITES
• openalex:w4393167568 · CITES
• openalex:w4401928712 · CITES
• openalex:w4406410979 · CITES
• openalex:w4406710826 · CITES
• openalex:w4409590517 · CITES
• openalex:w4410139091 · CITES
• openalex:w4411037943 · CITES

0 références entrantes au sein du corpus détecté

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.