How long is long-term? Comparing decadal- and centennial-scale insect diversity dynamics
Identification
- Clé publique
- radar:r-711dc674dc70824f408091391b0d3fd8
- Auteurs
- Engels, Stefan · Lane, Christine S · Wilkinson-Rowe, Eloise
- Année déclarée
- 2025
- Langue déclarée
- en
- Type source
- JournalArticle
- Première détection
- 2026-11-13T08:38:51.753224+00:00
- Dernière observation des métadonnées
- 2026-11-13T08:38:51.753224+00:00
- Dernière vérification HTTP
- Non effectuée
Résumé documentaire — langue originale
Anthropogenic changes to the environment are leading to a decrease in global biodiversity, with the aquatic insect fauna being particularly affected. Information on insect loss trends is mainly based on decadal-scale monitoring data, which does not allow natural baselines to be established, or for the impacts of multiple anthropogenic drivers to be separated. Here, we present decadal- and centennial-scale datasets of chironomid diversity change and quantitatively compare changes in chironomid diversity resulting from climate change and anthropogenic impacts. Our decadal-scale data show changes in community composition for a set of lakes near Bergen (Norway) between 1996 and 2019, but trends in diversity change were not unidirectional across the twenty study sites. We additionally analysed temporal trends in chironomid communities in sediment records obtained from two of the study sites in order to provide a centennial-scale perspective to the observed recent changes. The sediment records date back to ca. 800 CE, and on these longer timescales the effects of climate on insect diversity are clearly identifiable and quantifiable. By using a palaeoecological approach, we show that the decadal-scale data did not capture the full extent of human-induced insect dynamics in this region. We conclude that palaeoecological records contribute unique insights on baseline conditions, effects of individual drivers and long-term diversity trends. Such information is key for effective ecosystem restoration and insect conservation.
Identifiants
- DOI
- 10.17863/cam.116715
Repères documentaires
- Famille documentaire
- article
- Types déclarés par les sources
- JournalArticle
- Éditeurs
- Springer Nature
Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.
Sources
DataCite · Document 1
Citer cette référence
Engels, Stefan; Lane, Christine S; Wilkinson-Rowe, Eloise. How long is long-term? Comparing decadal- and centennial-scale insect diversity dynamics. 2025. https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.116715
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690 : formats bibliographiques fondés sur les champs disponibles. OSCOLA / Bluebook : données structurées uniquement ; aucune conformité juridique complète n’est revendiquée sans vérification des éléments nécessaires.
- APA
- Engels, Stefan; Lane, Christine S; Wilkinson-Rowe, Eloise. (2025). How long is long-term? Comparing decadal- and centennial-scale insect diversity dynamics. https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.116715
- Chicago
- Engels, Stefan; Lane, Christine S; Wilkinson-Rowe, Eloise. How long is long-term? Comparing decadal- and centennial-scale insect diversity dynamics. 2025. https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.116715
- ISO 690
- Engels, Stefan; Lane, Christine S; Wilkinson-Rowe, Eloise. How long is long-term? Comparing decadal- and centennial-scale insect diversity dynamics. 2025. https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.116715
Warning: Undefined array key "last_link_verified" in /home/clients/e27d81e12f04d2bfd747aa264540ac56/sites/_UDTR_APP/legal_library_reference.php on line 31
UDTR — Bibliothèque juridique mondiale des droits de la Nature. How long is long-term? Comparing decadal- and centennial-scale insect diversity dynamics. Notice documentaire: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-711dc674dc70824f408091391b0d3fd8/ · Dernière vérification HTTP : non effectuée
Données de cette version figée
Dossiers et relations documentaires
Rôles des sources
Source bibliographique / publication d’origine · https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/381579
Un lien vers une autorité ne prouve pas à lui seul une affirmation juridique. Les résumés et les textes intégraux restent soumis aux conditions de leur source.
Statut documentaire
Pertinence à examiner
Bibliothèque
Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.