UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

An empirical examination of liability for ecological environment restoration in the context of the Civil Code of China

Identification

Clé publique

doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31240

Auteurs

Fei Song · Kang Zhang · Baozhen Song

Année déclarée

2024

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-09T19:13:40.772351+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-09T19:13:40.772351+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

Liaocheng University · Qufu Normal University · Shandong University

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

In environmental tort lawsuits, China has been overly focused on "punishing" violators and has neglected the value of ecological environment restoration. The Article 1234 of Civil Code of China in 2021 has provided an important institutional guideline for the restoration of ecological environment and sustainable development in China. This paper analyzes 512 cases of ecological environment restoration liability and identifies five challenges in the judicial context: the lack of sound legal regulation, the lack of liability allocation, the mismatch of liability subjects, the difficulty of identifying damage facts, and the difficulty of effective implementation of restoration. In the face of these difficulties, countries that attach importance to ecological environment restoration, such as the United States, Germany and Japan, have provided experience that can be drawn on for China's ecological environment restoration liability. Based on foreign experience, China's liability for ecological environment restoration should be improved in the following aspects: first, to improve the legal system from basic laws and specific laws; second, to expand the scope of subjects from both litigation request subjects and liability subjects; third, to improve the identification and assessment mechanism and innovate the identification and assessment procedures in accordance with China's national conditions; fourth, to determine the restoration methods based on the criterion of "utilization value and the differences in the objects. The ultimate goal is to help China's Civil Code to be better applied judicially on the one hand, and to contribute to the world ecological protection on the other.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

W4396980262

DOI

10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31240

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Doctrine

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Juridictions étudiées — sources explicites

CN

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1 · Document 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31240
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W4396980262

Relations bibliographiques documentées

Références et liens déclarés par les sources ; ils ne constituent pas une preuve juridique ni une qualification UGLC. Affichage limité à 20 références sortantes.

• openalex:w1968300025 · CITES
• openalex:w2042586278 · CITES
• openalex:w3035797760 · CITES
• openalex:w3042970700 · CITES
• openalex:w3201285634 · CITES
• openalex:w4316371710 · CITES
• openalex:w4390124606 · CITES

0 références entrantes au sein du corpus détecté

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.