UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Restoration of Indigenous People’s Rights in Natural Resources Management

Identification

Clé publique

doi:10.55227/ijhess.v2i6.472

Auteurs

Ari Ade Kamula · Rachmad Safa’at · Imаm Koeswаhyono

Année déclarée

2023

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-09T19:18:18.015815+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-09T19:18:18.015815+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

University of Brawijaya

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

The position of Indigenous communities remains uncertain due to the biased recognition they receive. In other words, the recognition provided by the central or regional government is unsatisfactory as it is influenced by political and economic interests, as seen in the case of the Cek Bocek Reen Sury Indigenous Community, which has yet to obtain legal certainty. Therefore, the restoration of Indigenous rights, particularly in the management of natural resources that have been heavily sacrificed, requires improvements in recognition, participation, and natural resource management. This research employs a normative juridical method with a legislative and case study approach. Primary legal materials consist of various legislations, while secondary legal materials include books and scholarly journals specifically addressing the Cek Bocek Reen Sury Indigenous Community. The findings of this study indicate that the government plays a crucial role in resolving issues of bias towards Indigenous Law Communities, which can be initiated through the enactment of a Law on the Recognition of Indigenous Law Communities. Consequently, other derivative concepts such as Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) can soon be realized, thereby reducing mining conflicts

Identifiants

OPENALEX

W4384208658

DOI

10.55227/ijhess.v2i6.472

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Doctrine

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1 · Document 2 · Document 3

• Document · http://dx.doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v2i6.472
• DOI · https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v2i6.472
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W4384208658

Relations bibliographiques documentées

Références et liens déclarés par les sources ; ils ne constituent pas une preuve juridique ni une qualification UGLC. Affichage limité à 20 références sortantes.

• openalex:w2530624518 · CITES
• openalex:w2911370611 · CITES
• openalex:w3011904920 · CITES
• openalex:w3160865173 · CITES
• openalex:w3201624879 · CITES
• openalex:w4302555668 · CITES

0 références entrantes au sein du corpus détecté

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.