Upon an Unlikely Extension of the Notion of Representation
Identification
- Clé publique
- radar:r-5f7a83426ac9f8df5827be322ae6b84f
- Auteurs
- Karen
- Année déclarée
- 2005
- Langue déclarée
- en · eng
- Type source
- Conference object
- Première détection
- 2026-11-09T19:10:31.790926+00:00
- Dernière observation des métadonnées
- 2026-11-09T19:10:31.790926+00:00
- Dernière vérification HTTP
- Non effectuée
Résumé documentaire — langue originale
The aim of this paper is to demonstrate that the notion of representation can be used outside the traditional sphere of politics, by covering non-humans, that are taken to be represented by the sciences. Using this outlook, influenced by Latour (2004) , our purpose is to overcome the dichotomy between political and scientific discourse. Traditionally, political and scientific discourse are attributed to have sharply differing characteristics. Political discourse takes place at the heart of a representation process of individuals, citizens, trying to get a grip on their particularities, complaints, desires, needs and interests. The process of political representation is volatile, unstable and incomplete in principle, due to the nature of those who are represented. It is a kind of representation that needs to be rearticulated time and again to avoid ending up in a totalitarian system. Scientific discourse is presented and presents itself as having direct and privileged access to the truth, unhindered by the resistances offered by individual human and non-human obstacles. On the contrary, it is usually presented as having direct access to the realm of transparent truth. In this politics of the representation of nature, mathematics plays a crucial part, due to the fact that it seems to be the only method to achieve certain knowledge. The first observation is that while (s)he who engages in political discourse is held to give account, scientific discourse seems legitimated 'by itself' and apparently is in no need of further justification. On the contrary, it has been elevated to an authoritarian status when it comes to speaking 'wisely' about non-humans. Instead, we propose to recognize the political dimension of the representation of nature (non-humans). Therefore, the same requirements with regard to representation and democratic accountability could also be said to govern scientific discourse. We believe it would be fruitful of extending the representational discourse to the natural sciences. With Latour, we argue that the notion of politics should cover the representation of both humans and non-humans. Moreover, signs are clearly present that the distinction between humans and non-humans cannot be maintained. In view of the politics of concern, in any case, this dichotomy cannot persist, since both dimensions are connected, interrelated and of mutual influencing one another. In this presentation, firstly we shall explain how both humans and non-humans are interrelated. Secondly we briefly give an overview of the representation of humans (the political discourse). Thirdly, we deal with the extended notion of the representational discourse as the representation of non-humans (the scientific discourse), and finally we make the case for building bridges between both, where the construction of objectivity and neutrality enters into the picture. For this purpose we elaborate on the political aspect of Galilei's idea to 'write the book of nature in the language of mathematics' and on the impact of Descartes' rules of "Regulae Ad Directionem Ingenii".
Identifiants
- OPENAIRE
- od______3848::190a8bdb1c043e20cf83e7530fa0204f
Repères documentaires
- Famille documentaire
- Communication / colloque
- Types déclarés par les sources
- Conference object
Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.
Sources
OpenAIRE
Source documentaire directe en cours de consolidation
Provenance des champs documentaires
Les valeurs étayées et les valeurs de provenance non résolue sont séparées. Une provenance bibliographique ne valide aucune affirmation juridique.
- Titre
- Étayé par une source documentaire
- Publication
- Étayé par une source documentaire
- Auteurs
- Étayé par une source documentaire
- Type documentaire
- Étayé par une source documentaire
- Juridiction
- Non renseigné
- Cour
- Non renseigné
- Autorité émettrice
- Non renseigné
- Éditeur
- Non renseigné
- DOI
- Non renseigné
- ISBN
- Non renseigné
- Identifiant officiel
- Non renseigné
- URL source
- Non renseigné
- Statut déclaré par la source
- Non renseigné
- Modification / abrogation
- Non renseigné
Citer cette référence
Karen. Upon an Unlikely Extension of the Notion of Representation. 2005. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-5f7a83426ac9f8df5827be322ae6b84f/
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690 : formats bibliographiques fondés sur les champs disponibles. OSCOLA / Bluebook : données structurées uniquement ; aucune conformité juridique complète n’est revendiquée sans vérification des éléments nécessaires.
- APA
- Karen. (2005). Upon an Unlikely Extension of the Notion of Representation. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-5f7a83426ac9f8df5827be322ae6b84f/
- Chicago
- Karen. Upon an Unlikely Extension of the Notion of Representation. 2005. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-5f7a83426ac9f8df5827be322ae6b84f/
- ISO 690
- Karen. Upon an Unlikely Extension of the Notion of Representation. 2005. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-5f7a83426ac9f8df5827be322ae6b84f/
UDTR — Bibliothèque juridique mondiale des droits de la Nature. Upon an Unlikely Extension of the Notion of Representation. Notice documentaire: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-5f7a83426ac9f8df5827be322ae6b84f/ · Dernière vérification HTTP : non effectuée
Provenance par champ et version de la notice
Version 87830e8aac73672d · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Titre
- OpenAIRE · 2026-11-09T19:10:31.790926+00:00
- Auteurs
- OpenAIRE · 2026-11-09T19:10:31.790926+00:00
- Année
- OpenAIRE · 2026-11-09T19:10:31.790926+00:00
- Identifiants
- OpenAIRE · 2026-11-09T19:10:31.790926+00:00
L’historique porte sur les métadonnées de la notice, sans certifier l’état du droit.
59244b52f8bd84df · 2026-11-09T19:10:31.790926+00:00
fe0073d56a4ed1d4 · 2026-11-09T19:10:31.790926+00:00
e170b06697d2d32a · 2026-11-09T19:10:31.790926+00:00
87830e8aac73672d · 2026-11-09T19:10:31.790926+00:00
Données de cette version figée
Dossiers et relations documentaires
Rôles des sources
Un lien vers une autorité ne prouve pas à lui seul une affirmation juridique. Les résumés et les textes intégraux restent soumis aux conditions de leur source.
Statut documentaire
Pertinence à examiner
Bibliothèque
Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.