UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Handling of General Election Crimes in the Framework of Realizing Democratic and Responsible General Elections

Identification

Clé publique

radar:r-5c92e234a215fba6d2f3368c7387970d

Auteurs

Muhammad Sarkani · Ridwan · Mada Apriandi Zuhir · Henny Yuningsih

Année déclarée

2025

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-13T12:45:45.226789+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-13T12:45:45.226789+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Election Supervisory Body (Bawaslu) in handling election crimes, focusing on supervision mechanisms, policy implementation, and law enforcement outcomes. A descriptive qualitative method was used, with data collected through literature reviews on election regulations, Bawaslu reports, and relevant previous studies. The analysis assessed Bawaslu’s performance based on supervision quality, coordination with the Integrated Law Enforcement Center (Gakkumdu), law enforcement effectiveness, and obstacles encountered. The findings indicate that Bawaslu’s effectiveness relies on clear reporting procedures, responsiveness in handling reports, and investigative objectivity. Coordination with Gakkumdu plays a crucial role in ensuring transparent and efficient law enforcement, contributing to a decrease in election violations. However, challenges such as limited resources and weak regulations hinder optimal performance. This study highlights the need for capacity building, regulatory improvements, and stronger institutional synergy to enhance election crime handling.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

https://openalex.org/W4410797425

DOI

10.15575/ks.v7i1.44650

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

article

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Éditeurs

Sunan Gunung Djati State Islamic University Bandung

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1

• Document · https://doi.org/10.15575/ks.v7i1.44650

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.