UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Explaining the Status of Political Opponents in the Islamic Government Through the Recognition of Their Rights

Identification

Clé publique

doi:10.61838/jhrlp.132

Auteurs

M. S. Nia · Morteza Barati · Davood Dadashnezhad

Année déclarée

2026

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-09T19:04:47.959322+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-09T19:04:47.959322+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

Islamic Azad University, Damghan Branch

Pays d’affiliation déclarés

IR

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

This article examines the status, rights, and legal-religious foundations surrounding political and ideological opposition in an Islamic government, drawing on jurisprudential principles, historical precedents, and constitutional interpretations. It argues that Islamic governance does not inherently reject dissent but instead evaluates it through a multilayered framework that distinguishes peaceful critique from destabilizing rebellion and internal belief from harmful public action. By analyzing classical jurisprudence, including distinctions between belief and conduct, as well as modern legal approaches to due process, national security, and media regulation, the study demonstrates that political and ideological opponents occupy a recognized and protected space within Islamic political thought. Historical models—particularly the governance of Imam Ali—serve as foundational examples illustrating tolerance toward critique, the primacy of justice, and the ethical obligation to preserve human dignity even in the presence of disagreement. The article further outlines the rights afforded to opponents, including freedom of expression, participation, belief, conscience, and access to fair legal procedures, while also highlighting the boundaries imposed to prevent harm, sedition, or foreign exploitation. Through this integrated examination, the study shows that Islamic political jurisprudence provides a balanced and coherent system that safeguards legitimate dissent while upholding communal welfare and ethical governance. The findings contribute to contemporary discussions on Islamic political theory, offering a nuanced understanding of how opposition is conceptualized within a governance structure rooted in divine sovereignty and moral accountability.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

W7128468195

DOI

10.61838/jhrlp.132

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Doctrine

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1 · Document 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.61838/jhrlp.132
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W7128468195

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.