UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Directness of trial as a principle of Russian legislation on administrative proceedings

Identification

Clé publique

radar:r-56d3813362f888c3d11f2f2048ea2d7b

Auteurs

Svetlana Vladimirovna Giziatova · Анатолий Васильевич Курочкин

Année déclarée

2026

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-14T02:15:14.404491+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-14T02:15:14.404491+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

Kazan Federal University

Pays d’affiliation déclarés

RU

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

In this article, the results of a study that employed the systemic and formal logical methods, along with the normative reading of Russian procedural statutes, to investigate the substantive features of related procedural principles within Russian administrative proceedings are examined. The place of the principle of directness of trial proceedings both in the general system of legal principles and among the basic principles of administrative proceedings was clarified. In particular, as a legal principle, directness refers to a procedural obligation imposed on a trial court, but it manifests itself in other normative expressions through the actions performed by the subjects of administrative proceedings. Therefore, its legal effect extends far beyond the trial court and applies to all participants of administrative proceedings, regardless of their procedural status. Based on the analysis of the legislative norms and trends in Russian law enforcement practice, the substantive criteria of the principle of directness of trial in Russian administrative proceedings were formulated.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

https://openalex.org/W7125364727

DOI

10.26907/2541-7738.2025.5-6.242-253

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

article

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Éditeurs

Kazan Federal University

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1

• Document · https://doi.org/10.26907/2541-7738.2025.5-6.242-253

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.