UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Creating an appropriate tenure foundation for REDD+: The record to date and prospects for the future

Identification

Clé publique

doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.01.010

Auteurs

William D. Sunderlin · Claudio de Sassi · Erin O. Sills · Amy E. Duchelle · Anne Larson · Ida Aju Pradnja Resosudarmo · A. Awono · Demetrius Kweka · Thu Ba Huynh

Année déclarée

2018

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-09T19:18:05.507911+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-09T19:18:05.507911+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

Australian National University · Center for International Forestry Research · Federal Office for the Environment · North Carolina State University · The University of Melbourne

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

Attention to tenure is a fundamental step in preparation for REDD+ implementation. Unclear and conflicting tenure has been the main challenge faced by the proponents of subnational REDD+ initiatives, and accordingly, they have expended much effort to remedy the problem. This article assesses how well REDD+ has performed in laying an appropriate tenure foundation. Field research was carried out in two phases (2010–2012 and 2013–2014) in five countries (Brazil, Peru, Cameroon, Tanzania, Indonesia) at 21 subnational initiatives, 141 villages (half targeted for REDD+ interventions), and 3,754 households. Three questions are posed: 1) What was the effect of REDD+ on perceived tenure insecurity of village residents?; 2) What are the main reasons for change in the level of tenure insecurity and security from Phase 1 to Phase 2 perceived by village residents in control and intervention villages?; and 3) How do intervention village residents evaluate the impact of tenure-related interventions on community well-being? Among the notable findings are that: 1) tenure insecurity decreases slightly across the whole sample of villages, but we only find that REDD+ significantly reduces tenure insecurity in Cameroon, while actually increasing insecurity of smallholder agricultural land tenure in Brazil at the household level; 2) among the main reported reasons for increasing tenure insecurity (where it occurs) are problems with outside companies, lack of title, and competition from neighboring villagers; and 3) views on the effect of REDD+ tenure-related interventions on community well-being lean towards the positive, including for interventions that restrain access to forest. Thus, while there is little evidence that REDD+ interventions have worsened smallholder tenure insecurity (as feared by critics), there is also little evidence that the proponents’ efforts to address tenure insecurity have produced results. Work on tenure remains an urgent priority for safeguarding local livelihoods as well as for reducing deforestation. This will require increased attention to participatory engagement, improved reward systems, tenure policy reform, integration of national and local efforts, and “business-as-usual” interests.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

W2792615664

DOI

10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.01.010

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Doctrine

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Entités naturelles mentionnées

Forêt

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1 · Document 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.01.010
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W2792615664

Relations bibliographiques documentées

Références et liens déclarés par les sources ; ils ne constituent pas une preuve juridique ni une qualification UGLC. Affichage limité à 20 références sortantes.

• openalex:w108697149 · CITES
• openalex:w1409364088 · CITES
• openalex:w1484967238 · CITES
• openalex:w1510212503 · CITES
• openalex:w1513256807 · CITES
• openalex:w1516710914 · CITES
• openalex:w1583211533 · CITES
• openalex:w1598107959 · CITES
• openalex:w163752 · CITES
• openalex:w167038260 · CITES
• openalex:w1704120597 · CITES
• Frontiers of Commodification: State Lands and Their Formalization · CITES
• openalex:w1915154712 · CITES
• openalex:w1951724000 · CITES
• openalex:w2006833299 · CITES
• openalex:w2017576628 · CITES
• openalex:w2027270891 · CITES
• openalex:w2036566599 · CITES
• Land tenure and REDD+: The good, the bad and the ugly · CITES
• openalex:w2046919216 · CITES

6 références entrantes au sein du corpus détecté

Statut documentaire

Publication académique détectée

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.