UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

The relevance of international restoration principles for ecosystem restoration practice in Rwanda

Identification

Clé publique

doi:10.1111/rec.14085

Auteurs

Marina Frietsch · Joern Fischer · Beth A. Kaplin · Berta Martín‐López

Année déclarée

2024

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-10T13:56:29.707979+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-10T13:56:29.708214+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

Leuphana University of Lüneburg · University of Massachusetts Boston · University of Rwanda

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

The restoration of degraded ecosystems is considered a key strategy to contribute to ecological integrity and human well‐being. To support restoration practice, 10 “Principles to guide the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration 2021–2030” were conceived through a consultative process and put forward by a group of leading international restoration actors. The extent to which these principles can inform successful restoration activities on the ground, however, remains largely unknown. Using a combination of qualitative and quantitative data collection methods, we probed 32 stakeholders who plan, manage, and implement restoration in Rwanda to elicit which factors they perceive as most important for successful restoration based on the UN Decade principles. Using the Q‐methodology, we discovered that participants overall agreed that the UN Decade principles are relevant to inform successful ecosystem restoration in the study area. Further, the Q‐study revealed three distinct groups of stakeholders with different priorities in terms of opinions on restoration aims, stakeholder involvement, and relevant spatial scales. Based on semi‐structured interviews, we identified four considerations for successful restoration that require special attention in future restoration interventions in the study area: (1) restoring historical conditions, (2) collecting baseline data, (3) increasing local communities' sense of ownership, and (4) pursuing a long‐term vision for restoration activities. To address these considerations and thereby harvest the potential of ecosystem restoration to benefit both people and nature in the long run, diverse stakeholders with different priorities for restoration need to come together to discuss possible differences in their perceived priorities, perspectives, and approaches.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

W4390656263

DOI

10.1111/rec.14085

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Doctrine

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Juridictions étudiées — sources explicites

RW

Entités naturelles mentionnées

Écosystème

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1 · Document 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.14085
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W4390656263

Relations bibliographiques documentées

Références et liens déclarés par les sources ; ils ne constituent pas une preuve juridique ni une qualification UGLC. Affichage limité à 20 références sortantes.

• openalex:w1566741571 · CITES
• openalex:w1600429647 · CITES
• openalex:w1898332528 · CITES
• openalex:w1982748232 · CITES
• openalex:w2008162856 · CITES
• openalex:w2008251417 · CITES
• openalex:w2057551514 · CITES
• openalex:w2062980459 · CITES
• openalex:w2074581824 · CITES
• openalex:w2099526933 · CITES
• openalex:w2120247749 · CITES
• openalex:w2122925767 · CITES
• openalex:w2129128614 · CITES
• openalex:w2132024018 · CITES
• openalex:w2132186017 · CITES
• openalex:w2135307267 · CITES
• openalex:w2168854389 · CITES
• openalex:w2189340722 · CITES
• openalex:w2301653380 · CITES
• openalex:w25368090 · CITES

0 références entrantes au sein du corpus détecté

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.