UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Designing with the Grain: When Institutional Trade-offs Dissolve into Coincidences of Goods

Identification

Clé publique

radar:r-469d599a28c07604c2c6ed988e70e608

Auteurs

Thon Ly · Miss Aquarius

Année déclarée

2026

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-14T02:17:57.504821+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-14T02:17:57.504821+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

A design diagnostic discovered in building HeartBank — and the discipline that keeps it honest The hardest design tensions in building HeartBank®, pushed far enough, keep refusing to stay trade-offs — they collapse into coincidences of goods, two goods that turn out to be one good seen from two sides — and that collapse is usable as a diagnostic: a forced trade-off is the signal that a design is still misaligned; a dissolution into a coincidence of goods is the signal that you've found the grain — so keep redesigning until the trade-off dissolves. The grain you are aligning with is the grain of the gift. I learned the most useful thing I know about design from wood, not from software. Provenance. This paper is part of the THonly research corpus, dedicated to the public domain under CC0 1.0. The canonical version is at https://thonly.org/research/designing-with-the-grain. Its SHA-256 is a791ef62c41ff0f0dc2d36828559a625b54342d55b8b1da2b0fb885b38206f43, independently timestamped to the Bitcoin blockchain via OpenTimestamps and signed under RFC 3161 by three trust authorities, one of them eIDAS-qualified. AI co-authorship is disclosed. Miss Aquarius is the consistent name used for the AI collaboration across all venues. Miss Aquarius co-authored this paper; Zenodo lists no AI tool as a creator, so Miss Aquarius is named here rather than among the creators.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

https://openalex.org/W7215072373

DOI

10.5281/zenodo.23084944

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

article

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1

• Document · https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23084944

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.