UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Journal of Environmental Law & Litigation : Vol. 22, No. 2, p. 231-266 : Fourth Amendment Privacy Rights at Sea and Systems: There's Something Fishy About This

Identification

Clé publique

handle:1794/5636

Auteurs

Crance, Jason R. · Mastry, Mike

Année déclarée

2007

Langue déclarée

und · en_US

Type source

Article

Première détection

2026-11-09T19:07:39.537535+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-09T19:07:39.537535+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

36 p. A print copy of this title is available through the UO Libraries under the call number: LAW LIB. K 10 .O425 In early 2007, Congress passed, and the President subsequently signed into law, the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Reauthorization Act of 2006.23 Included in the reauthorization were several amendments to the Act.24 Among those amendments is a requirement that the government improve the sharing of VMS data among relevant state and federal agencies.25 While the government’s use of VMS to protect marine resources has been generally applauded, the constitutionality of such 24-hour surveillance deserves further scrutiny. This Article examines the real-life situation unfolding within the Gulf of Mexico’s reef fish fishery in order to highlight the privacy issues arising from the government’s 24-hour surveillance of commercial vessels. Part I takes a historical look at the evolution of Fourth Amendment jurisprudence as it relates to technological advances employed by governmental entities over the past century. Part II explores the constitutionality of the government’s 24-hour VMS surveillance by analyzing a not-so-hypothetical scenario in the Gulf of Mexico. Parts III and IV analyze the scenario presented in Part II and conclude that the government’s current VMS requirements may already infringe upon the constitutionally protected privacy rights of commercial fishers.

Identifiants

HANDLE

1794/5636

OAI

oai:scholarsbank.uoregon.edu:1794/5636

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Doctrine

Types déclarés par les sources

Article

Juridictions étudiées — sources explicites

MX

Entités naturelles mentionnées

Mer

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

Repository · Document 1

• Document · https://hdl.handle.net/1794/5636

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.