UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

„NECESARA CARANTINĂ”. Reguli etică și medici în Bucovina (1780–1860)

Identification

Clé publique

radar:r-3c70323f3cb44c94a3b23357e02f04d8

Auteurs

Universitatea „Ștefan cel Mare”, Suceava, Institutul „Bucovina”, Rădăuți · Harieta Mareci-Sabol

Année déclarée

—

Langue déclarée

und

Type source

journal-article

Première détection

2026-11-13T09:02:36.399253+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-13T09:02:36.399253+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

<jats:p>The article highlights the quarantine in Bukovina as a structured and organized plague warning system at the eastern border of the Habsburg Monarchy. The arrangement of stations (larger or smaller) since the end of the 18th century within the permanent cordon on the military frontier proved to be a means of preventing the spread of terrible epidemics. According to the regulations throughout the empire, people, goods and animals had to be controlled, disinfected, and – in extreme conditions – isolated. The physicians and surgeons of the quarantines in Bukovina had to respect the structural and organizational rules of the system, implementing them as a means of sanitary prevention. The course of their career indicates that some wanted to access the status of Director of quarantines, a better-paid position that offered the opportunity to assert themselves at the local and regional level as representatives of a state responsible for the welfare and health of its subjects. Coming from distant territories, doctors (directors or not) assumed both the risks of the profession and the isolation in spaces that some historians of medicine called “strangers”.</jats:p>

Identifiants

DOI

10.56308/ab.2024.1.04

ISSN

1221-9975 · 2668-7127

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

article

Types déclarés par les sources

journal-article

Éditeurs

Bukovina Institute of the Romanian Academy

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

Crossref · Document 1

• Document · https://doi.org/10.56308/ab.2024.1.04

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.