UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

The Legal Standing of the Anak Dalam Tribe in Initiating Class Action Lawsuits Regarding Land Disputes

Identification

Clé publique

doi:10.23969/litigasi.v26i2.29708

Auteurs

Adithiya Diar · Amanda Dea Lestari

Année déclarée

2025

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-09T19:04:47.706445+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-09T19:04:47.706445+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

Universitas Adiwangsa Jambi

Pays d’affiliation déclarés

ID

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

This article examines the persistent influence of legal formalism within Indonesia’s civil justice system and its implications for the protection of Indigenous Peoples’ customary land rights, particularly through class action litigation and the doctrine of legal standing. Land disputes involving Indigenous communities reflect structural injustice, as legal recognition remains heavily dependent on administrative validation rather than historical, social, and cultural realities. Consequently, Indigenous Peoples often face significant barriers in accessing justice, despite constitutional acknowledgment of their existence and rights. Using normative legal research, this study analyzes statutory frameworks, judicial decisions, and doctrinal approaches governing class actions and legal standing in Indonesia. The findings demonstrate that existing procedural mechanisms frequently marginalize Indigenous communities by imposing rigid standing requirements and evidentiary standards that are incompatible with their collective and customary social structures. Rather than functioning as instruments of empowerment, class actions often reproduce exclusion through excessive proceduralism. The study argues that Indigenous marginalization stems not from the absence of substantive rights, but from the dominance of formalistic reasoning that prioritizes administrative legality over substantive justice. To address this imbalance, the article proposes a normative reconstruction of civil procedural law, including the establishment of a lex specialis on class actions and Indigenous legal standing, the contextual reinterpretation of standing doctrines, the integration of ecological and social justice principles, and the adoption of participatory and culturally responsive judicial approaches. These reforms are essential to ensure equitable access to justice within Indonesia’s plural legal system.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

W7128725950

DOI

10.23969/litigasi.v26i2.29708

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Doctrine

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Juridictions étudiées — sources explicites

ID

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1 · Document 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.23969/litigasi.v26i2.29708
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W7128725950

Relations bibliographiques documentées

Références et liens déclarés par les sources ; ils ne constituent pas une preuve juridique ni une qualification UGLC. Affichage limité à 20 références sortantes.

• openalex:w2131776560 · CITES
• openalex:w2591391727 · CITES
• openalex:w2793156249 · CITES
• openalex:w2904575327 · CITES
• openalex:w2942799905 · CITES
• openalex:w2965999861 · CITES
• openalex:w2976972447 · CITES
• openalex:w2980791316 · CITES
• openalex:w3091762066 · CITES
• openalex:w3106615460 · CITES
• openalex:w3112634369 · CITES
• openalex:w3121240413 · CITES
• openalex:w3165860455 · CITES
• openalex:w3203635375 · CITES
• openalex:w4200492053 · CITES
• openalex:w4206015637 · CITES
• Well grounded: Indigenous Peoples' knowledge, ethnobiology and sustainability · CITES
• openalex:w4288759794 · CITES
• openalex:w4294203452 · CITES
• openalex:w4321614479 · CITES

0 références entrantes au sein du corpus détecté

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.