UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

The Eco Jurisprudence Monitor: Tracking Global Developments in Ecological Law

Identification

Clé publique

doi:10.5194/wbf2026-26

Auteurs

Craig

Année déclarée

2026

Langue déclarée

en · und

Type source

Article

Première détection

2026-11-09T19:04:47.964739+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-09T19:11:05.417570+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

University of Oregon

Pays d’affiliation déclarés

US

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

This presentation introduces the Eco Jurisprudence Monitor (EJM), a pioneering open-access platform that tracks the global rise of ecological jurisprudence initiatives and provides a searchable archive of related legal documents. Ecological jurisprudence refers to legal frameworks that challenge anthropocentric assumptions and seek to embed ecological principles into law and governance systems. Since the early 2000s, there has been exponential growth in legal initiatives rooted in ecological jurisprudence, including rights of nature, ecocide laws, ecological constitutionalism, Earth trusteeship, and Indigenous-led legal approaches. These movements—numbering over 550 initiatives across 44 countries—represent an emerging paradigm shift in legal norms and values, aiming to address planetary crises like climate change and biodiversity loss through systemic transformation. The EJM enables systematic, comparative analysis by providing a relational database and searchable legal archive of ecological law initiatives. It categorizes legal developments across six broad approaches, including rights-based, responsibilities-based, Indigenous, and science-based eco-governance frameworks. It also disaggregates initiatives by legal instrument (e.g., constitutions, court rulings, statutes, policies, declarations) and tracks the conceptual framing, legal actors involved, governance arrangements, and ecological entities addressed. The presentation details the EJM’s conceptual framework and data methodology, including its effort to balance inclusivity with analytic clarity while integrating Indigenous knowledge systems, as well as patterns related to the rise of ecological law globally. Findings based on EJM data reveal that ecological jurisprudence is increasingly institutionalized in domestic and international law through diverse pathways—including judicial rulings, local ordinances, tribal law, and international soft law. The presentation argues that understanding this legal evolution is essential to studying global norm change and environmental governance innovation to meet existing environmental crises related to climate change and biodiversity loss. By facilitating comparative, interdisciplinary research, the EJM offers a critical tool for scholars, policymakers, and activists seeking to understand and support the legal transformations needed to navigate ecological collapse and advance planetary justice.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

W7134938525

DOI

10.5194/wbf2026-26

OPENAIRE

doi_________::0dbfd828fade2a00dcd485f45ebeaaf1

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Doctrine

Types déclarés par les sources

Article · conference-abstract

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAIRE · Document 1

OpenAlex · Document 1 · Document 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.5194/wbf2026-26
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W7134938525

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.