UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

The Doctrine of Consensual Sovereignty: Quantifying Legitimacy in Adversarial Environments—_The Axiom of Consent_

Identification

Clé publique

openalex:w7115979438

Auteurs

Farzulla, Murad

Année déclarée

—

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-09T19:04:47.790441+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-09T19:04:47.790441+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

This paper develops a unified analytical framework for measuring political legitimacy across heterogeneous governance domains.Building on insights from constitutional political economy, social choice theory, and institutional analysis, the framework establishes consent-holding-the mapping from decision domains to those with authority over them-as a structural necessity of collective action.We formalize this intuition through five axioms and five theorems, demonstrating that legitimacy can be operationalized as stakes-weighted consent alignment α(d, t), while friction F (d, t) measures the deviation between outcomes and stakeholder preferences.The framework bridges normative democratic theory and empirical prediction, generating testable hypotheses about institutional stability.Historical validation examines suffrage expansion, abolition movements, labor rights, and contemporary platform governance, demonstrating how misalignment between stakes and voice generates observable instability.Unlike existing approaches that prescribe ideal institutions, this framework provides analytical tools for measuring legitimacy within any governance structure, enabling systematic comparison across democratic, technocratic, and algorithmic systems.Computational mechanism comparison via Bayesian learning dynamics across 1000 Monte Carlo runs demonstrates relative performance under adaptive agents: when preferences update based on observed policy outcomes, stakes-weighted DoCS achieves highest final alignment (α = 0.872) with lowest terminal friction (F = 1.5, 94.9% reduction from initial F = 30.3).This comparative advantage holds across static baseline (α = 0.627), learning dynamics (α = 0.872), and alternative temporal mechanisms, suggesting stakes-weighting produces superior initial matches that persist even when agents adapt to institutional performance.The framework's domain-specific approach resolves the apparent tension between consent and competence, showing both as complementary dimensions of institutional legitimacy.This framework is part of the Adversarial Systems Research program, which examines stability, alignment, and friction dynamics in complex systems where competing interests generate structural conflict.Murad Farzulla 1 v1.0.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

W7115979438

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Doctrine

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1

• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W7115979438

Relations bibliographiques documentées

Références et liens déclarés par les sources ; ils ne constituent pas une preuve juridique ni une qualification UGLC. Affichage limité à 20 références sortantes.

• openalex:w2001910686 · CITES
• openalex:w2017990047 · CITES
• openalex:w7106579932 · CITES

0 références entrantes au sein du corpus détecté

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.