UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Does the ‘One Map Initiative’ Represent a New Path for Forest Mapping in Indonesia? Assessing the Contribution of the REDD+ Initiative in Effecting Forest Governance Reform

Identification

Clé publique

doi:10.3390/f8010014

Auteurs

Mari Mulyani · Paul R. Jepson

Année déclarée

2016

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-09T19:18:18.019738+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-09T19:18:18.019738+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

University of Indonesia · University of Oxford

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

This study investigates one notable result that the REDD+ (‘Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation, and enhancing forest carbon stocks and conservation’) initiative effected within Indonesia’s forest institutions. It argues that during its interplay with existing National forest institutions REDD+ produced a significant benefit; namely, the ‘one map initiative’ (OMI) being the government’s response to the call for greater transparency and enabling of REDD+ implementation. It asks: “Does the ‘One Map Initiative’ signify a switch to a new path of map-making, or is it just another innovation within an existing path dependence of forest governance?” Through eighty semi-structured interviews with ‘REDD+ policy actors’ and the deployment of ‘path dependence’ theory, this study seeks to determine the extent to which the REDD+ initiative created a ‘critical juncture’ (i.e., momentum for institutions to move to a new path). This study maps the institutional path dependence within forest-mapping as a means for the state to gain control of forest resources. In its development process the OMI has shown its ability to break the old path-dependence of map-making (e.g., lack of transparency, low level of public participation, and poor coordination amongst ministries). Moreover, this paper identified several historical events (i.e., ‘critical junctures’) that preceded the REDD+ initiative as contributing factors to the relative success of REDD+ in effecting forest governance reform.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

W2564651282

DOI

10.3390/f8010014

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Doctrine

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Juridictions étudiées — sources explicites

ID

Entités naturelles mentionnées

Forêt

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1 · Document 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.3390/f8010014
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W2564651282

Relations bibliographiques documentées

Références et liens déclarés par les sources ; ils ne constituent pas une preuve juridique ni une qualification UGLC. Affichage limité à 20 références sortantes.

• openalex:w1086791933 · CITES
• openalex:w11367234 · CITES
• openalex:w134175558 · CITES
• openalex:w1488499274 · CITES
• openalex:w1494272666 · CITES
• openalex:w1505575117 · CITES
• openalex:w1551113116 · CITES
• openalex:w1552457998 · CITES
• openalex:w1561018600 · CITES
• openalex:w1572125629 · CITES
• openalex:w1599348445 · CITES
• openalex:w1973391424 · CITES
• openalex:w1976156334 · CITES
• openalex:w1978657862 · CITES
• openalex:w1990000295 · CITES
• openalex:w1997760448 · CITES
• openalex:w2002524831 · CITES
• openalex:w2004202852 · CITES
• openalex:w2007870700 · CITES
• openalex:w2016204775 · CITES

0 références entrantes au sein du corpus détecté

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.