UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Institutional Configuration and Competence of the Special Judiciary for Regional Election Disputes: A Comparative Study and Prospects for Implementation

Identification

Clé publique

radar:r-311effaa8825dd127dcf45b96684de23

Auteurs

Firdaus Arifin · Ihsanul Maarif · Cece Suryana · TATY SUGIARTI · Anastasia Wahyu Murbani

Année déclarée

2025

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-14T02:18:25.929561+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-14T02:18:25.929561+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

Universitas Pasundan · National University of East Timor

Pays d’affiliation déclarés

ID · TL

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

The dispute resolution system for Regional Head Elections in Indonesia continues to face challenges related to fragmented authority, inconsistencies in judicial decisions, and procedural limitations, which may lead to legal uncertainty and undermine the legitimacy of election outcomes. This study aims to explore the weaknesses of the existing system and propose a more effective institutional model for resolving Pilkada disputes. Employing a normative legal approach with a comparative study method, this research analyzes electoral judicial systems in Mexico, the Philippines, and Germany to identify institutional principles that can be adapted to the Indonesian legal framework. Additionally, this study examines the national legal framework, including Constitutional Court rulings on Pilkada dispute resolution, to assess the effectiveness and limitations of the current mechanisms. The findings indicate that Indonesia’s Pilkada dispute resolution system still suffers from overlapping jurisdiction among institutions, inconsistencies in judicial rulings, and delays in dispute resolution processes. Comparative analysis suggests that a more integrated system, is more effective in ensuring legal certainty and judicial independence. Therefore, this study recommends the establishment of a specialized judicial body for Pilkada disputes, endowed with exclusive jurisdiction, institutional independence, and a transparent and expedited dispute resolution process. The implications of this research highlight that institutional reform in Pilkada dispute resolution is crucial for enhancing public trust in the electoral judicial system, strengthening electoral democracy, and upholding the rule of law in Indonesia’s Regional Head Elections process.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

https://openalex.org/W7165133355

DOI

10.33756/jlr.v7i2.30949

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

article

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Éditeurs

State University of Gorontalo

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1

• Document · https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v7i2.30949

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.