UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Science-policy interface in participatory reforms: Integrating forest governance principles into Romania's forestry strategy

Identification

Clé publique

doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103670

Auteurs

Nicolae Talpă · Liviu Nichiforel · Aureliu-Florin Hălălișan · Adrian Indreica · V. D. Păcurar · Laura Bouriaud · Ionuț Bărnoaiea · Marian Drăgoi · C. M. Enescu · Bogdan Popa

Année déclarée

2025

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-09T19:14:22.143717+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-09T19:14:22.143717+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

Transilvania University of Brașov · University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Bucharest · Ştefan cel Mare University of Suceava

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

This research provides a vivid example of the science-policy interface through a large-scale, academically mediated consultation process supporting the development of Romania's National Forest Strategy 2030. The systematic design of the public consultation was implemented between July 2020 and February 2021 by Romania's two main forestry faculties, under the auspices of the Ministry of Environment, Water and Forests. The process engaged 226 stakeholders in a structured dialogue to formulate substantiated positions on guiding principles, strategic directions, and specific measures for national forest policy. The findings, based on two successive questionnaires, identified varying degrees of consensus on thirteen guiding principles and twenty-two strategic directions grouped in nine thematic areas of action. Broad agreement emerged on priorities such as forest landscape restoration, biodiversity conservation, transparent administration, and ecological education, while significant divergences were observed concerning the level of property rights restrictions, the instruments to ensure the continuity of forest ecosystem services, and the segregation versus integration of biodiversity in forest management. The science-based consultation process demonstrates that a transparent and rigorously structured dialogue fosters constructive exchange even in polarized stakeholders' environments and low-trust institutional settings. The study highlights the potential for harmonizing socio-economic views and ecological approaches on forest management. The findings are discussed in the context of alignment and divergence with the EU Forest Strategy 2030, and recommendations are provided for enhancing participatory governance and evidence-based policy making in forestry. • Science-policy interface strengthens consultation processes for policy development. • Transparent, rigorously structured dialogue fosters exchange in polarized environments. • Consensus on legal coherence, ecosystem resilience, economic viability, science-based policy, and transparent governance. • Key challenges in property rights, financing ecosystem services, biodiversity representativity, and results-based measures. • Prioritized strategic directions in forest restoration, biodiversity conservation, digitalization, and forest education.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

W4416823779

DOI

10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103670

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Doctrine

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Juridictions étudiées — sources explicites

RO

Entités naturelles mentionnées

Forêt · Écosystème · Paysage

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1 · Document 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103670
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W4416823779

Relations bibliographiques documentées

Références et liens déclarés par les sources ; ils ne constituent pas une preuve juridique ni une qualification UGLC. Affichage limité à 20 références sortantes.

• openalex:w1820040206 · CITES
• openalex:w1965390467 · CITES
• openalex:w1973721437 · CITES
• openalex:w1979290264 · CITES
• openalex:w1993405966 · CITES
• openalex:w2009299416 · CITES
• openalex:w2024386336 · CITES
• openalex:w2082507151 · CITES
• openalex:w2090514174 · CITES
• openalex:w2112613414 · CITES
• openalex:w2120214319 · CITES
• openalex:w2168682319 · CITES
• openalex:w2321703047 · CITES
• openalex:w2330666425 · CITES
• openalex:w2461790999 · CITES
• openalex:w2596080851 · CITES
• openalex:w2606628468 · CITES
• openalex:w2617518942 · CITES
• openalex:w2713208050 · CITES
• openalex:w2766136866 · CITES

1 références entrantes au sein du corpus détecté

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.