UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Impact of emerging technologies on legal interpretation

Identification

Clé publique

radar:r-2f35a766be5517a90364cd0d49ab396f

Auteurs

Johana Lisbeth Mafla Sánchez · Carmen Marina Méndez Cabrita · Anthony Raúl Benalcázar-Pozo

Année déclarée

2025

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-14T02:16:49.668372+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-14T02:16:49.668372+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

Universidad Regional Autónoma de Los Andes

Pays d’affiliation déclarés

EC

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

Introduction: The integration of artificial intelligence into legal practice has generated a growing debate about its ability to complement, but not replace, human interpretation of legal rules. In fact, ethical concerns have been raised about the integration of this technology with respect to the legal environment. Consequently, the present study has focused on analyzing the impact of artificial intelligence on legal practice, and in particular on legal hermeneutics. Likewise, it is intended to determine the main challenges that prevent its integration as a tool in the optimization of legal operation.Methods: A bibliographic review and surveys of legal professionals were used to analyze the role of artificial intelligence in the legal field. As well as the modeling of Saaty's AHP method in identifying the challenges with the greatest impact in the implementation of artificial intelligence in the legal sphere.Results: The results indicate that, although artificial intelligence has improved efficiency in repetitive and data management tasks, the critical and contextual interpretation of standards constitutes a human task. However, the adoption of this tool has faced barriers such as resistance to change and lack of specialized training.Conclusions: It is essential to adopt actions that allow artificial intelligence to assist in data management without replacing human interpretation. In addition, it is necessary to develop regulatory frameworks and continuous training programs that ensure an ethical and effective integration of artificial intelligence in law.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

https://openalex.org/W4408515966

DOI

10.56294/sctconf2025635

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

article

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1

• Document · https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf2025635

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.