UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

‘Strategic Litigation in English Judicial Review’, 28(4) Judicial Review (2023) 261

Identification

Clé publique

radar:r-2f24165de57ad43a620bc5d36696aba3

Auteurs

Michael Ramsden

Année déclarée

—

Langue déclarée

Undetermined

Type source

publication

Première détection

2026-11-13T15:29:10.895438+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-13T15:29:10.895438+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

<jats:p>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;The practice of “strategic litigation” has become a settled feature of English judicial review but there has been little attempt so far to take stock of the current state of research into this practice. The following article aims to act as an opener to the nature of strategic litigation in English judicial review. It outlines the key features of this litigation model and evaluates the major trends in the literature. It notes that while the existing research provides important insights into aspects of strategic litigation, there is a need for more specified and comprehensive studies into this practice. In an era where judicial review has come under pointed attack within government, deeper qualitative research into strategic litigation - a practice that is arguably a major cause of the ongoing political backlash against the courts - is essential to provide a clearer understanding as to the legitimacy of this litigation model and the extent to which it can produce the impact desired by its protagonists.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</jats:p>

Identifiants

DOI

10.2139/ssrn.7007558

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

unknown

Types déclarés par les sources

publication

Éditeurs

Elsevier BV

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAIRE · Document 1

• Document · https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.7007558

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.