UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Casting Justice Before Swine: The Prosecution of Pigs in Late Medieval France

Identification

Clé publique

openalex:w3174291084

Auteurs

Sven Gins

Année déclarée

2021

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-09T19:04:47.732953+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-09T19:14:29.792051+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

In recent years, animals have become increasingly involved in human legal proceedings. Legal scholars have embraced the animal turn, blurring the once sovereign boundaries between persons and objects, and recognising animals, perhaps even Nature herself, as legal subjects. The ongoing Covid-19 pandemic stresses the urgency of establishing ‘global animal law’ and deconstructing anthropocentrism yet again, by highlighting the appalling daily living conditions that many animals must endure in places such as animal markets. To this end, it is vital to also consider the extensive premodern legal history that humans share with animals. Over 200 so-called animal trials have been recorded in Europe between the Late Middle Ages and the twentieth century. In these proceedings, animals who had allegedly violated Christianity’s natural hierarchy were vigorously prosecuted, at times resulting in capital punishment or even anathema. I problematise the notion that these trials constitute wholesome legal precedents of the kind of legal personhood presently debated in jurisprudence, evidenced in my counter-hegemonic analysis of the legal prosecution and execution of several pigs in fifteenth-century France. Rather, late mediaeval notions of criminality transcended the human-nonhuman binary whilst perpetuating and reifying the alleged human-nonhuman divide. I propose that animal trials were local laboratories where human communities reflected upon the natural order of God’s creation. Ensuing the apparent breach of the prescribed boundaries of nature, these communities renegotiated and re-naturalised everyday interspecies sociability. In so doing, societies utilised the offending animals to exemplify particular ideas about what it means to be human, generally to the animals’ detriment. Mediaeval studies, I maintain, have an ethical duty to address these and other forms of animal suffering in human history to expose and destabilise the longue durée of human exceptionalism and its devastating socio-ecological consequences.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

W3174291084

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Doctrine

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Juridictions étudiées — sources explicites

FR

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1 · Document 2

• Document · https://research.rug.nl/en/publications/f7bc1580-5833-4ea8-b6ac-b8ed43fe480e
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W3174291084

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.