UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

The context of REDD+ in Vietnam: Drivers, agents and institutions

Identification

Clé publique

doi:10.17528/cifor/003737

Auteurs

Phạm T.T. · M. Moeliono · Nguyen T.H. · Nguyen H.T. · Vu T.H.

Année déclarée

2012

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

book

Première détection

2026-11-09T19:18:05.507710+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-09T19:18:05.507710+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

This report discusses the political, economic and social opportunities and constraints that will influence the design and implementation of REDD+ in Vietnam. In particular, four major direct drivers (land conversion for agriculture; infrastructure development; logging (illegal and legal); forest fire) and three indirect drivers (pressure of population growth and migration; the state's weak forest management capacity; the limited funding available for forest protection) of deforestation and degradation in Vietnam are discussed, along with their implications for REDD+. These drivers and their impacts vary from region to region, and change over time - no ‘one-size-fitsall' formula will function across the whole of Vietnam. The report also examines the lessons learnt from various forestry and economic development policies and programmes and suggests how a future REDD+ mechanism can overcome the major challenges, which include limited funding for forest protection, weak local governance capacity, poor vertical and horizontal coordination, low involvement of the poor, women and indigenous groups, low economic returns, elite capture of land and benefits, and corruption. The report suggests that if REDD+ is to succeed, it must be participatory, that is, all players are given fair and ample opportunity to be part of the programme (particularly those with the least resources or the greatest economic disenfranchisement); transparent, that is, all players can trace how the programme is administered, including the distribution of benefits; and well-monitored, to ensure that the programme is conducted such that it meets its overarching objectives and guidelines. The success of REDD+ will also require that it take a pro-poor and pro-gender equity approach.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

W1600903546

DOI

10.17528/cifor/003737

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Livre

Types déclarés par les sources

book

Juridictions étudiées — sources explicites

VN

Entités naturelles mentionnées

Forêt

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Description bibliographique du livre

Disponibilité non établie

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1 · Document 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/003737
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W1600903546

Relations bibliographiques documentées

Références et liens déclarés par les sources ; ils ne constituent pas une preuve juridique ni une qualification UGLC. Affichage limité à 20 références sortantes.

• openalex:w1035839484 · CITES
• openalex:w1523499752 · CITES
• openalex:w1689076925 · CITES
• openalex:w1708131804 · CITES
• openalex:w175112820 · CITES
• openalex:w1981455352 · CITES
• openalex:w2075362951 · CITES
• openalex:w2081415989 · CITES
• openalex:w2083302513 · CITES
• openalex:w2092973853 · CITES
• openalex:w2113675242 · CITES
• openalex:w2137341515 · CITES
• openalex:w2153234443 · CITES
• openalex:w2173620155 · CITES
• openalex:w2188829257 · CITES
• openalex:w2279703230 · CITES
• openalex:w2303943018 · CITES
• openalex:w29377786 · CITES
• openalex:w4234718565 · CITES
• openalex:w4247279274 · CITES

10 références entrantes au sein du corpus détecté

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.