UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Examining support for the rights of Indigenous Peoples and local communities in the context of REDD+ in the DRC, Indonesia and Peru: A comparative analysis with recommendations for further progress

Identification

Clé publique

openalex:w7065706211

Auteurs

T. Lasheras · Sarmiento Barletti · Larson, A.M. · Tamara, A. · Liswanti, N. · Rodríguez, S. · Marie-Bernard Dhedya Lonu

Année déclarée

2023

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

other

Première détection

2026-11-09T19:04:47.808658+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-09T19:04:47.808658+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

Examining support for the rights of Indigenous Peoples and local communities in the context of REDD+ in the DRC, Indonesia and Peru A comparative analysis with recommendations for further progress Key messages• Cancun safeguards were established to -at a minimum -prevent the most harmful impacts ("do no harm") on the territories, livelihoods and sociocultural lives of the Indigenous Peoples and local communities (IPs and LCs) that steward forests where REDD+ interventions are implemented.However, these safeguards are to be interpreted by each country based on their own legal frameworks and policy priorities.• Comparative analysis of the rights of IPs and LCs in the legal frameworks and policies of the DRC, Indonesia, and Peru -three of the four countries with highest tropical forest cover -reveals different levels of recognition and respect for the rights of IPs and LCs in the context of REDD+.• These different engagements with the rights of IPs and LCs, and divergence from rights recognized under international agreements (e.g., UNDRIP), reveal that progress from safeguards that 'do no harm' to ones that aim to 'do better' will be challenging and uneven.• 'Doing better' requires greater effort, starting with a reconsideration of REDD+ proponents as duty bearers and communities as rights holders with the capacities and mechanisms to hold the former accountable (e.g., monitoring of rights obligations including access to participation and benefits).• Further reflection at the level of the UNFCCC is needed to decide whether safeguards should 'do better'.This would require laying out levels of ambition more clearly and transparently, providing clearer guidelines and more stringent requirements for REDD+ countries, and a more robust monitoring of their compliance.• The evidence of the impact of IPs and LCs as stewards of forest landscapes of high biodiversity suggests that safeguards that 'do better' by supporting their self-determination and access and control of their ancestral territories, will not only be transformative in terms of equity but also will support REDD+'s wider goals. April 2023This flyer is part of a series on REDD+ safeguards, focusing on the rights and social inclusion concerns of the women and men of the Indigenous Peoples and local communities (IPs and LCs) that steward the forests where climate solutions are implemented.Flyers provide lessons for application in different national contexts, present evidence for decision makers and practitioners to consider the implications and benefits of supporting the rights of IPs and LCs, and contribute to the participation of IPs and LCs representatives in discussions on and monitoring of safeguards.2 Examining support for the rights of Indigenous Peoples and local communities in the context of REDD+ in the DRC, Indonesia and PeruSeries on social safeguards standards #6

Identifiants

OPENALEX

W7065706211

HANDLE

10568/131114

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Autre

Types déclarés par les sources

other

Juridictions étudiées — sources explicites

ID · PE

Entités naturelles mentionnées

Forêt · Paysage · Territoire

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1 · Document 2

• Document · https://hdl.handle.net/10568/131114
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W7065706211

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.