Insights on human−wildlife coexistence from social science and Indigenous and traditional knowledge
Identification
- Clé publique
- radar:r-27c4d85fb6606a8f30c680594c4562ba
- Auteurs
- Helina Jolly · Amanda Lee Stronza
- Année déclarée
- 2025
- Langue déclarée
- en
- Type source
- article
- Première détection
- 2026-11-13T14:47:45.765815+00:00
- Dernière observation des métadonnées
- 2026-11-13T14:47:45.765815+00:00
- Dernière vérification HTTP
- Non effectuée
Institutions déclarées par la source
University of Vermont · University of California San Diego · Texas A&M University
Pays d’affiliation déclarés
US
Résumé documentaire — langue originale
Much work on human-wildlife conflict focuses on safeguarding wildlife from humans and vice versa, protecting humans, their crops, livestock, and property from wildlife, and mitigating negative, sometimes lethal encounters. The emphasis is on conflict, a framing that reinforces human-nature dualisms and instills the notion of humans and wild animals as adversaries. Although human-wildlife interactions are sometimes negative, they can also be neutral, coadaptive, and mutually beneficial. They can demonstrate coexistence. Conservationists have tended to overlook or simplify such relations. They have either failed to define coexistence or characterized it as the outcome of externally driven conservation strategies. Conflict has been perceived as the norm, with coexistence a distant ideal. This way of seeing ignores the many ways people have coexisted with wildlife and coadapted with wild animals in multispecies landscapes for generations. We encourage greater attention to Indigenous and traditional experiences and knowledge, and seeing how coexistence can be a norm, which sometimes includes negative interactions and conflict. Scholars in geography, anthropology, animal studies, philosophy, Indigenous studies, and multispecies ethnography offer insights into how paying attention to coexistence can reshape understanding of human-wildlife interactions that decenters humans, and actively supports ethical conservation. Contributions from social scientists include focusing on relational ways of thinking and seeing that the lives of humans and other beings are intertwined and not governed solely by conflict.
Identifiants
- OPENALEX
- https://openalex.org/W4409076027
- DOI
- 10.1111/cobi.14460
- PMID
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40165698
- PMCID
- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/11959325
Repères documentaires
- Famille documentaire
- article
- Types déclarés par les sources
- article
- Éditeurs
- Wiley
Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.
Sources
OpenAlex · Document 1
Citer cette référence
Helina Jolly; Amanda Lee Stronza. Insights on human−wildlife coexistence from social science and Indigenous and traditional knowledge. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.14460
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690 : formats bibliographiques fondés sur les champs disponibles. OSCOLA / Bluebook : données structurées uniquement ; aucune conformité juridique complète n’est revendiquée sans vérification des éléments nécessaires.
- APA
- Helina Jolly; Amanda Lee Stronza. (2025). Insights on human−wildlife coexistence from social science and Indigenous and traditional knowledge. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.14460
- Chicago
- Helina Jolly; Amanda Lee Stronza. Insights on human−wildlife coexistence from social science and Indigenous and traditional knowledge. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.14460
- ISO 690
- Helina Jolly; Amanda Lee Stronza. Insights on human−wildlife coexistence from social science and Indigenous and traditional knowledge. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.14460
Warning: Undefined array key "last_link_verified" in /home/clients/e27d81e12f04d2bfd747aa264540ac56/sites/_UDTR_APP/legal_library_reference.php on line 31
UDTR — Bibliothèque juridique mondiale des droits de la Nature. Insights on human−wildlife coexistence from social science and Indigenous and traditional knowledge. Notice documentaire: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-27c4d85fb6606a8f30c680594c4562ba/ · Dernière vérification HTTP : non effectuée
Données de cette version figée
Dossiers et relations documentaires
Rôles des sources
Source bibliographique / publication d’origine · https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.14460
Un lien vers une autorité ne prouve pas à lui seul une affirmation juridique. Les résumés et les textes intégraux restent soumis aux conditions de leur source.
Statut documentaire
Pertinence à examiner
Bibliothèque
Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.