UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Guidance or punishment? The crucial role of courts of accounts in the oversight of public works

Identification

Clé publique

radar:r-21e529407447a96d8b299b8488bb226f

Auteurs

Marco Antonio Portugal · Gabriela Scur

Année déclarée

2025

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-14T02:31:37.155426+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-14T02:31:37.155426+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

Centro Universitário FEI

Pays d’affiliation déclarés

BR

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

IMPACTPublic works managers, auditors, engineers, and policy-makers operating at different levels of government will find evidence-based insights in this article to improve the continuity and efficiency of infrastructure projects. The study demonstrates that interruptions are often less a result of corruption and more a consequence of technical and administrative shortcomings, especially where institutional capacity is limited. By examining how audit institutions navigate the balance between punitive and pedagogical roles, the article highlights strategies that practitioners can adopt to reduce stoppages, optimise resources, and enhance project delivery. For auditors and oversight professionals, the findings encourage a shift toward preventive and educational practices, while still preserving accountability mechanisms. For engineers and project managers, the research shows how sectoral complexities, particularly in large-scale infrastructure and mobility projects, demand tailored approaches to risk management. These lessons extend beyond any single context, offering guidance for strengthening governance and maximizing public value in diverse institutional environments.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

https://openalex.org/W4414769336

DOI

10.1080/09540962.2025.2566922

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

article

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Éditeurs

Taylor & Francis

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1

• Document · https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2025.2566922

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.