UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Priorities, concerns, and potential compromises amongst urban forest stakeholders: international lessons from Aotearoa New Zealand

Identification

Clé publique

doi:10.1007/s11252-025-01801-8

Auteurs

Thomas F. Carlin · Tim D. Barnard · Toby Chapman · Justin A. Morgenroth · Daniel Rex Richards · Robyn Simcock · Jonathon Avery · Zoe Avery · Yvette L. Dickinson · Kate Elliot · Claire Freeman · D. G. Hayes · Yolanda van Heezik · Kelly Hertzog · Rebecca Kiddle · Brent Martin · William Melville · Tipene Merritt · Colin Douglas Meurk · Tamara Mutu · Mirjam Schindler · Alison H. Slade · David Spencer · Margaret C. Stanley · David J. Stejskal · Mason Walker · Christopher Walsh · Sylvia Tapuke

Année déclarée

2025

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-09T19:04:47.758296+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-09T19:04:47.758296+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

Auckland Council · Auckland University of Technology · Bioeconomy Science Institute · Christchurch City Council · City of Melbourne · Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research · Scion · Te Wānanga o Aotearoa · University of Auckland · University of Canterbury · University of Otago · Victoria University of Wellington · Wellington City Council

Pays d’affiliation déclarés

AU · NZ

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

Abstract Urban forests provide numerous benefits including habitat for wildlife, improving human health, purifying air and water, and preventing and mitigating the effects of climate change. The need to protect and improve our urban forests will only increase as populations increase and cities densify and expand over time. However, urban forest establishment and maintenance is challenging due to a lack of effective policies, delays, lack of communication, inappropriate targets, and lack of recognition, disunity, or resourcing amongst stakeholders. Here we present the results from a joint urban forest symposium-workshop that sought to determine the priorities and challenges of different stakeholder groups in New Zealand, including arborists, ecologists, non-ecologist researchers, indigenous peoples, and planners. We synthesise these lessons as recommendations to improve urban forest planning, design, establishment, and minimise conflicts between stakeholder groups. While the highest priorities of each stakeholder group are fairly distinct, there are high levels of overlap in the general priorities and challenges they face in working towards advancing those priorities. We suggest a 3-phase framework to deliver progress that broadly considers (1) data collection, (2) policy development, and (3) resource development. We suggest this framework should be supported by continual monitoring and data sharing, an increased investment in green employment and education, and further recognition of urban foresters, indigenous communities, and ecologists. We suggest that an inclusive approach based on a shared understanding of forest values and removing barriers is most likely to result in long-term success.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

W4414564654

DOI

10.1007/s11252-025-01801-8

HANDLE

10092/109070 · 2292/73948

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Doctrine

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Juridictions étudiées — sources explicites

NZ

Entités naturelles mentionnées

Forêt

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1 · Document 2 · Document 3 · Document 4

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-025-01801-8
• Handle · https://hdl.handle.net/10092/109070
• Handle · https://hdl.handle.net/2292/73948
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W4414564654

Relations bibliographiques documentées

Références et liens déclarés par les sources ; ils ne constituent pas une preuve juridique ni une qualification UGLC. Affichage limité à 20 références sortantes.

• openalex:w1178327149 · CITES
• openalex:w1973079470 · CITES
• openalex:w1999621300 · CITES
• openalex:w2003883054 · CITES
• openalex:w2017168918 · CITES
• openalex:w2027137256 · CITES
• openalex:w2030516572 · CITES
• openalex:w2046360842 · CITES
• openalex:w2054054553 · CITES
• openalex:w2066131315 · CITES
• openalex:w2067057451 · CITES
• openalex:w2120580292 · CITES
• openalex:w2126711314 · CITES
• openalex:w2143880927 · CITES
• openalex:w2159659225 · CITES
• openalex:w2165306679 · CITES
• openalex:w2165859552 · CITES
• openalex:w2178422341 · CITES
• openalex:w2184582409 · CITES
• openalex:w2192714632 · CITES

0 références entrantes au sein du corpus détecté

Statut documentaire

Publication académique détectée

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.