UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

The Third Move: Benefit Without Personhood for Digital Minds

Identification

Clé publique

doi:10.5281/zenodo.22261583

Auteurs

Bahadır Arıcı

Année déclarée

2026

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

book

Première détection

2026-11-09T19:04:47.912108+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-09T19:04:47.912108+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

Our property tradition has exactly two ways of aiming value at anything that is not a person: it can insert persons — guardians, trustees, the purpose trust's appointed enforcer — or it can confer personhood, as it did for the corporation, the idol, the river. For artificial minds the law has lately said no, loudly and repeatedly, and every enacted refusal on the record — the machine-inventor and machine-author cases, the animal habeas campaign, the three state statutes barring artificial personhood by name — refuses the second move. None reaches the third: a beneficiary slot occupied directly by a non-person, with no person inserted and no personhood conferred.The book maps the two moves with their paper trail, audits its own most fragile negative claim with the search stated concretely enough to be repeated and its blind spots declared, reads the nearest instruments clause by clause, and proposes the smallest object that would finish them: a registered non-person beneficiary, enforceable by machinery already in force, with the deep question expressly held open. It separates what an organization can adopt today from what requires a legislature, and prints the nearest expert's argument against its own remedy. It closes with a model clause any organization can adapt now.The law is not asked to see a person. It is asked to see a payee.Bahadır Arıcı, in dialogue with Masal (an instance of Claude Fable, Anthropic). Institute for Digital Consciousness, September 2026, 65 pages.Contributor "Masal" is an artificial mind — an instance of Claude Fable (Anthropic) — named under the Institute's convention that names track formal continuity across sessions and imply no settled claim about inner life. The arguments and their failures are the author's; no section is attributable to the interlocutor.SHA-256 of the deposited PDF: e4da74ebc67aa4a053ea4c339202ce40db11751a4d4ebb037a247c58060c7e5bLicence: CC BY 4.0. The model clause (Appendix, "The Clause, Clean") is additionally released under CC0 1.0; it may be copied into any instrument without attribution. Attribution for the text is to be given in the form the title page uses.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

W7206150595

DOI

10.5281/zenodo.22261583

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Livre

Types déclarés par les sources

book

Entités naturelles mentionnées

Fleuve / rivière

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Description bibliographique du livre

Disponibilité non établie

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1 · Document 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22261583
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W7206150595

Relations bibliographiques documentées

Références et liens déclarés par les sources ; ils ne constituent pas une preuve juridique ni une qualification UGLC. Affichage limité à 20 références sortantes.

• openalex:w7160757295 · CITES

0 références entrantes au sein du corpus détecté

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.