UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Places as Persons: Creating a New Framework for Māori-Crown Relations

Identification

Clé publique

doi:10.5040/9781509930401.ch-011

Auteurs

Andrew Geddis · Jacinta Ruru

Année déclarée

2020

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

book-chapter

Première détection

2026-11-09T19:04:47.721892+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-09T19:04:47.721892+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

In 2014, an Act of the Aotearoa New Zealand Parliament recognised the 2,127 square kilometre former Te Urewera National Park as being a ‘legal entity’ possessing ‘all the rights, powers, duties, and liabilities of a legal person’. In March of 2017, another enactment acknowledged the country’s 300-kilometre-long Whanganui River as ‘a legal person [with] all the rights, powers, duties, and liabilities of a legal person’. In late 2017, the Crown and Taranaki Māori signed a record of understanding that Parliament will in the future legislate to grant the 2,518-metre-tall Mount Taranaki/Mount Egmont legal personhood. By virtue of these legislative acts, the various geographic entities gain an independent existence in the eyes of the law. Rather than being mere Crown or public property, they own themselves. They are deemed to be holders of their own rights, which may be asserted in legal proceedings and other fora. In short, they are no longer ‘things’ over which human beings exercise dominion; they are ‘persons’ with which humans have a relationship. The question, then, is why did Aotearoa New Zealand’s Parliament make the decision to grant legal personality to these natural features in order to reflect the ‘cosmological view’ of Māori? Our answer in this chapter is fundamentally constitutional in nature. Recognising personhood broke a deadlock between the Crown and some individual Iwi when settling historical pre-1992 injustices within the context of the Treaty of Waitangi. It was thus a form of principled compromise that permitted redress for the extensive Crown breaches of the Treaty, whilst creating the basis for a new future relationship. But beyond permitting a solution to historical injuries, the legal recognition of these places-as-persons also changes the way in which they are conceived of by the majority Pākehā nation and how all citizens will interact with them in the future. In part, this change will come from the different stewardship arrangements that have been established to speak for these now-persons and to safeguard their interests. That change also will reflect the fact that a legal shift in what these entities are seen as being – a move from conceiving of them purely in state law as instrumental things to persons with which an ongoing relationship exists – will alter how human interactions with them take place. That is to say, the inclusion of these places as persons within the web of laws and practices that govern Aotearoa New Zealand inevitably will make a difference to how those laws and practices operate in relation to those places beyond the norm of conservation law.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

W3004070797

DOI

10.5040/9781509930401.ch-011

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Chapitre d’ouvrage

Types déclarés par les sources

book-chapter

Entités naturelles mentionnées

Fleuve / rivière

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Description bibliographique du livre

Disponibilité non établie

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1 · Document 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509930401.ch-011
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W3004070797

Relations bibliographiques documentées

Références et liens déclarés par les sources ; ils ne constituent pas une preuve juridique ni une qualification UGLC. Affichage limité à 20 références sortantes.

10 références entrantes au sein du corpus détecté

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.