UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Norm Entrepreneurs Sidestep REDD+ in Pursuit of Just and Sustainable Forest Governance

Identification

Clé publique

doi:10.3390/su10061726

Auteurs

Neil M. Dawson · Michael Mason · Janet Fisher · David Mujasi Mwayafu · Hari Dhungana · Heike Schroeder · Mark Zeitoun

Année déclarée

2018

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-09T19:17:52.603120+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-09T19:17:52.603120+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

London School of Economics and Political Science · Norwich Research Park · University of East Anglia · University of Edinburgh

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

This paper explores the dissonance between conceptions of justice among forest-adjacent communities and their representation in global forest policies, a persistent barrier to delivering just sustainability. We empirically track justice claims of rural villagers upwards through specific intermediaries or ‘justice brokers’: civil society, state, or private sector actors operating at local to international levels, who navigate different institutions to advance various social and ecological interests. We draw on interviews with 16 intermediaries in each of Nepal and Uganda and find that recognition of local values and practices such as customary tenure systems are key justice concerns of forest-adjacent communities in each country. However, intermediaries perceive a low likelihood of advancing those claims through national or international climate and forest policy debates, such as REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation), in large part because deliberations on justice are subordinated to concerns such as carbon accounting and arrangements for distributing monetary benefits. This suggests these policy processes must be modified to offer potential for transformational pathways. Intermediaries who pursued recognition justice issues developed innovative tactics in alternative forums. These ‘norm entrepreneurs’ adopted a suite of complementary strategies to attain influence, including: (1) formation of associations at the grassroots level; (2) media and advocacy campaigns through national coalitions to reach powerful international donors, and; (3) drawing on international support networks for advice, training and to influence national government. In both Uganda and Nepal these strategies were evidenced to enhance recognition for local values and practices.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

W2803358303

DOI

10.3390/su10061726

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Doctrine

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Entités naturelles mentionnées

Forêt

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1 · Document 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061726
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W2803358303

Relations bibliographiques documentées

Références et liens déclarés par les sources ; ils ne constituent pas une preuve juridique ni une qualification UGLC. Affichage limité à 20 références sortantes.

• openalex:w1488643198 · CITES
• openalex:w1596723470 · CITES
• openalex:w1904473669 · CITES
• openalex:w1959122336 · CITES
• openalex:w1964041090 · CITES
• openalex:w1970389408 · CITES
• openalex:w1988894183 · CITES
• openalex:w1989533101 · CITES
• openalex:w1997141739 · CITES
• openalex:w2002311592 · CITES
• openalex:w2005061451 · CITES
• openalex:w2008252663 · CITES
• openalex:w2017101394 · CITES
• openalex:w2023983108 · CITES
• openalex:w2035763864 · CITES
• openalex:w2036551813 · CITES
• openalex:w2037165956 · CITES
• openalex:w2039002682 · CITES
• openalex:w2042615677 · CITES
• openalex:w2048897847 · CITES

1 références entrantes au sein du corpus détecté

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.