UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Beyond harvests in the commons: multi-scale governance and turbulence in indigenous/community conserved areas in Oaxaca, Mexico

Identification

Clé publique

doi:10.18352/bmgn-lchr.328

Auteurs

David Barton Bray · Elvira Durán · Oscar Molina

Année déclarée

2012

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-09T19:18:30.358453+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-09T19:18:30.358453+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

Florida International University · Instituto Politécnico Nacional

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

Some important elements of common property theory include a focus on individual communities or user groups, local level adjudication of conflicts, local autonomy in rule making, physical harvests, and low levels of articulation with markets. We present a case study of multi-scale collective action around indigenous/community conserved areas (ICCAs) in Oaxaca, Mexico that suggests a modification of these components of common property theory. A multi-community ICCA in Oaxaca demonstrates the importance of inter-community collective action as key link in multi-scale governance, that conflicts are often negotiated in multiple arenas, that rules emerge at multiple scales, and that management for conservation and environmental services implies no physical harvests. Realizing economic gains from ICCAs for strict conservation may require something very different than traditional natural resource management. It requires intense engagement with extensive networks of government and civil society actors and new forms of community and inter-community collection action, or multi-scale governance. Multi-scale governance is built on trust and social capital at multiple scales and also constitutes collective action at multiple scales. However, processes of multi-scale governance are also necessarily “turbulent” with actors frequently having conflicting values and goals to be negotiated. We present an analytic history of the process of emergence of community and inter-community collective action around strict conservation and examples of internal and external turbulence. We argue that this case study and other literature requires an extensions of the constitutive elements of common property theory.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

W2143698303

DOI

10.18352/bmgn-lchr.328

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Doctrine

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Juridictions étudiées — sources explicites

MX

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1 · Document 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.18352/bmgn-lchr.328
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W2143698303

Relations bibliographiques documentées

Références et liens déclarés par les sources ; ils ne constituent pas une preuve juridique ni une qualification UGLC. Affichage limité à 20 références sortantes.

• The Problem of Fit between Ecosystems and Institutions: Ten Years Later · CITES
• openalex:w1502798522 · CITES
• openalex:w155374982 · CITES
• openalex:w1573084417 · CITES
• openalex:w1581113062 · CITES
• openalex:w1592955475 · CITES
• openalex:w1593640053 · CITES
• openalex:w1593765756 · CITES
• openalex:w1594994281 · CITES
• openalex:w1598107049 · CITES
• openalex:w161104946 · CITES
• openalex:w1918744767 · CITES
• openalex:w1933060365 · CITES
• openalex:w1968223252 · CITES
• openalex:w1993268220 · CITES
• openalex:w1996760592 · CITES
• openalex:w2001393532 · CITES
• openalex:w2012443778 · CITES
• openalex:w2014194341 · CITES
• openalex:w2030322090 · CITES

2 références entrantes au sein du corpus détecté

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.