UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

At‑Tijārah al‑Mubīqah (Destructive Business and Trade): Qurʾān, Ḥadīth, Qawā‘id al-Fiqhiyyah and Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah Perspective

Identification

Clé publique

doi:10.28918/religia.v29i1.8595

Auteurs

Muhammad Fauzi · Al Mahdi · Arzam Arzam · Mursal Mursal

Année déclarée

2026

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-09T19:04:47.744333+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-09T19:04:47.744333+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

Al-Ahgaff University · Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kerinci

Pays d’affiliation déclarés

ID · YE

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

This study aims to analyse and formulate a conceptual framework of at‑tijārah al‑mubīqah based on the perspectives of the Qurʾān, ḥadīth al‑sabʿu al‑mubīqāt, qawāʿid al‑fiqhiyyah, and maqāṣid al‑sharīʿah. Three research questions are addressed: (1) what is the conceptual definition of at‑tijārah al‑mubīqah, and how does it differ from ideal business and trade when viewed through the Qurʾān, ḥadīth, qawāʿid al‑fiqhiyyah, and maqāṣid al‑sharīʿah, with ḥadīth al‑sabʿu al‑mubīqāt as the main normative framework; (2) how can the manifestations of ḥadīth al‑sabʿu al‑mubīqāt be identified and explained as forms of at‑tijārah al‑mubīqah in the modern context through the analysis of qawāʿid al‑fiqhiyyah and the assessment of their impact on maqāṣid al‑sharīʿah; and (3) how can an integrated conceptual framework of at‑tijārah al‑mubīqah be constructed and function as a normative reference for contemporary business practice. This study employs a qualitative approach through library research, using a normative‑descriptive and analytical‑conceptual design. Data are collected from primary sources and reinforced by secondary sources, and analysed using content analysis combined with tafsīr mauḍūʿī, qawāʿid al‑fiqhiyyah, and maqāṣid al‑sharīʿah as analytical tools. The study shows that at‑tijārah al‑mubīqah encompasses all tijārah activities that contain one or more elements of ḥadīth al‑sabʿu al‑mubīqāt, identified through qawāʿid al‑fiqhiyyah as ḍarar that must be eliminated, and that substantially damage maqāṣid al‑sharīʿah at a significant, widespread, and sustained level. Seven main manifestations are identified in the modern business ecosystem: shirk, magic (siḥr), structural soul murder, ribā, consuming the wealth of orphans, betrayal of trust (amānah), and fitnah against the honour of Muslim women. To the best of the author’s knowledge, this is the first study to systematically construct at‑tijārah al‑mubīqah as a formal academic taxonomy in Islamic business ethics explicitly derived from ḥadīth al‑sabʿu al‑mubīqāt, while simultaneously integrating qawāʿid al‑fiqhiyyah and maqāṣid al‑sharīʿah into a single four‑layer conceptual framework. The study offers a novel reading, particularly of three categories of al‑mubīqāt in the landscape of modern business: the ḥadīth phrase “killing a soul is forbidden by Allah Subḥānahu Wa Taʿālā, except with ḥaq” is positioned as structural soul murder; the prohibition of “fleeing from the battlefield” is read as betrayal of trust (amānah); and “accusing a chaste Muslim woman of adultery (qadzaf)” is interpreted as fitnah against the honour of Muslim women. Accordingly, this study not only broadens the conceptual discourse but also enriches the ethical‑empirical mapping of destructive patterns within contemporary business ecosystems

Identifiants

OPENALEX

W7204575043

DOI

10.28918/religia.v29i1.8595

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Doctrine

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Entités naturelles mentionnées

Écosystème · Paysage

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1 · Document 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.28918/religia.v29i1.8595
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W7204575043

Relations bibliographiques documentées

Références et liens déclarés par les sources ; ils ne constituent pas une preuve juridique ni une qualification UGLC. Affichage limité à 20 références sortantes.

• openalex:w1979677867 · CITES
• openalex:w2038760905 · CITES
• openalex:w2051558356 · CITES
• openalex:w2059312591 · CITES
• openalex:w2230919288 · CITES
• openalex:w2315012886 · CITES
• openalex:w2428470939 · CITES
• openalex:w2529610071 · CITES
• openalex:w2538168602 · CITES
• openalex:w2558021850 · CITES
• openalex:w2795153545 · CITES
• openalex:w2901984258 · CITES
• openalex:w2953854581 · CITES
• openalex:w2974852924 · CITES
• openalex:w2982112457 · CITES
• openalex:w2986624628 · CITES
• openalex:w3007124838 · CITES
• openalex:w3045607753 · CITES
• openalex:w3102484148 · CITES
• openalex:w3120763461 · CITES

0 références entrantes au sein du corpus détecté

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.