UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Comparison of Supporting Laws for Children Born Out of Wedlock: Study of Aceh MPU Fatwa No. 18/2015 and MUI Fatwa No. 11/2012 from the Maqasid Shari'ah Perspective

Identification

Clé publique

doi:10.47766/al-hiwalah.v5i1.7654

Auteurs

Zuniar Zega · Nanda Riswanda Pohan · Shalawati Shalawati · Laila Pitri · Junaidi Junaidi

Année déclarée

2026

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-09T19:04:47.762524+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-09T19:04:47.762524+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau · Universitas Serambi Mekkah

Pays d’affiliation déclarés

ID

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

This study examines the differences in legal reasoning between MPU Aceh Fatwa No. 18 of 2015 and MUI Fatwa No. 11 of 2012 regarding the maintenance rights of children born out of wedlock in Indonesia. The main issue addressed in this research concerns the legal responsibility of biological fathers toward children born from non-marital relationships and the extent to which Islamic law can address contemporary demands for child protection without undermining the principle of lineage (nasab). This research aims to analyze the methodological framework of both fatwas and evaluate their relevance within the framework of Islamic family law and Indonesian positive law in light of Constitutional Court Decision No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010. The study employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. Primary legal materials include the two fatwas, legislation, court decisions, classical Islamic jurisprudence, and contemporary scholarly opinions, while secondary materials consist of books, journal articles, and previous studies. The findings reveal that both fatwas agree that children born outside of marriage have lineage relations only with their mothers and maternal families. However, they differ significantly regarding financial responsibility. The MPU Aceh strictly denies the biological father’s obligation to provide child support, whereas the MUI introduces ta’zir and wasiat wajibah as mechanisms to ensure the child’s welfare without recognizing lineage. The study concludes that the MUI’s approach is more contextually appropriate and aligned with the objectives of Islamic law (maqasid al-syari‘ah) and contemporary child protection principles in Indonesia.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

W7218929423

DOI

10.47766/al-hiwalah.v5i1.7654

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Doctrine

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1 · Document 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.47766/al-hiwalah.v5i1.7654
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W7218929423

Relations bibliographiques documentées

Références et liens déclarés par les sources ; ils ne constituent pas une preuve juridique ni une qualification UGLC. Affichage limité à 20 références sortantes.

• openalex:w4415148624 · CITES

0 références entrantes au sein du corpus détecté

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.