UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

“Land Without Identifiable Ownership” in the Post-East Japan Earthquake Recovery: Lawful Land-Grabbing in Neoliberal Japan

Identification

Clé publique

radar:r-07853765915075e06f7bae5a1fed7181

Auteurs

Yuka Kaneko

Année déclarée

—

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

journal-article

Première détection

2026-11-14T03:03:25.008819+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-14T03:03:25.008819+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>This paper, with a focus on the status of tsunami disaster victims affected by the 2011 East Japan Earthquake, investigates into the status of private property rights in facing with the reviving legal instrumentalism in Japan, under the campaign of land law reform for the elimination of “land without identifiable owners” in the name of facilitating the disaster recovery, by means of the “special zone” method or the designation of lawless areas where the normal time law is excluded, with the particularly targeted area for such exclusion being the constitutional requirements of due process and fair compensation in public taking. Under the extraordinary setting of absolute majority of conservative party at the National Diet in the aftermath of the 2011 great disaster, legislations in Japan during this decade have been characterized by a manifestation of neo-liberal policy, driving the entire Japanese legal system into a corner. Facts observed in present Japanese society are not different from those observed in other authoritarian regimes in Asia, including the phenomenon of “land grabbing” by the governmental projects, which Asia once experienced a century ago for the colonial land enclosure by “wasteland management.”</jats:p>

Identifiants

DOI

10.1017/als.2024.9

ISSN

2052-9015 · 2052-9023

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

article

Types déclarés par les sources

journal-article

Éditeurs

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

Crossref · Document 1

• Document · https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2024.9

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.