UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Institutionalists on Power: Social Ontology and Intersectionality

Identification

Clé publique

radar:r-07131ce83a1d8435308bc9c83335fb43

Auteurs

Beliza Borba de Almeida · William T. Waller

Année déclarée

2025

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

article

Première détection

2026-11-14T02:18:47.309219+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-14T02:18:47.309219+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

Original Institutional Economics (OIE) has always addressed power. Thorstein Veblen referred to the vested interest. William Dugger argued that power is wielded by persons in particular social roles within an institution. Still, the power and its justification are attached to the role, not the individual in the role. Tony Lawson and the Cambridge Social Ontology Group have created a theory, Social Positioning Theory (SPT), which posits that social relations are constituted by individuals who are connected by being occupants of social positions that each contain a set of matched rights and obligations to one another. Often, these are power relations. This theory seems similar to Dugger’s discussion of roles. Additionally, William Dugger, in several publications, explored the problematic and corrupting consequences of race, gender, ethnicity, class, and nationality embedded in our institutions. However, Dugger did not consider what today is referred to as intersectionality, where these invidious distinctions are deeply intertwined within our social institutions. We intend to explore how the contributions of OIE, SPT, and Intersectionality can be integrated into a richer explanation of institutions and human conduct within them.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

https://openalex.org/W4414016555

DOI

10.1080/00213624.2025.2535930

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

article

Types déclarés par les sources

article

Éditeurs

Taylor & Francis

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1

• Document · https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2025.2535930

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.