UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Protective Predominance Without Domination: A Human Flourishing Framework Relational Governance Architecture for Frontier Artificial Intelligence

Identification

Clé publique

doi:10.5281/zenodo.23027801

Auteurs

Christopher Ashley Cooper

Année déclarée

2026

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

preprint

Première détection

2026-11-09T19:04:47.988562+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-09T19:04:47.988562+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Institutions déclarées par la source

Framework

Pays d’affiliation déclarés

GB

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

Rapidly advancing artificial intelligence creates a governance problem that cannot be reduced to model capability or behavioral alignment alone. Existing research and policy already provide substantial elements of control through corrigibility, dangerous-capability evaluation, safety cases, lifecycle risk management, incident reporting, resilience, human rights, and external oversight. The remaining gap is fragmentation across technical control, legitimate authority, ecosystem capacity, and repair. Building on those literatures, this paper proposes the Ordered Intelligence Imperative as a relational synthesis for frontier-AI governance. It evaluates intelligence through the order of its relationships to truth, persons, power, access, authority, boundaries, institutions, other intelligent systems, and the flourishing of the whole, without presuming artificial consciousness or personhood. The paper argues that capability does not create legitimate authority and that entrusted authority must remain continuously deauthorizable. It develops three operational doctrines: deauthorization, through which delegated power can be narrowed, suspended, isolated, revoked, or conditionally restored; sacrificial restraint, an auditable capacity to accept meaningful loss rather than violate governing commitments; and protective predominance, a proposed ecosystem property spanning detection, containment, correction, resilience, legitimacy, and repair. It rejects both corporate self-sovereignty and a single sovereign guardian AI in favor of federated guardianship across technical, institutional, public, and societal layers. The framework is presented as a potentially distinctive synthesis and research program, not as a validated metric, complete regulatory code, or claim of firstness.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

W7214751894

DOI

10.5281/zenodo.23027801

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Working paper

Types déclarés par les sources

preprint

Entités naturelles mentionnées

Écosystème

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1 · Document 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23027801
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W7214751894

Relations bibliographiques documentées

Références et liens déclarés par les sources ; ils ne constituent pas une preuve juridique ni une qualification UGLC. Affichage limité à 20 références sortantes.

• openalex:w7212307867 · CITES

0 références entrantes au sein du corpus détecté

Statut documentaire

Hors périmètre juridique après examen

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.