UDTR — Radar mondial des droits de la Nature

Divine Continuity Corpus: The Universal Covenant of Sacred Life, Humanity, Peace, and Recoverable Futures

Identification

Clé publique

radar:r-01649fb040ed583f671cfa76023fc057

Auteurs

Noelia Sanchez · Interval Studio

Année déclarée

2026

Langue déclarée

en

Type source

report

Première détection

2026-11-14T02:29:39.236504+00:00

Dernière observation des métadonnées

2026-11-14T02:29:39.236504+00:00

Dernière vérification HTTP

Non effectuée

Résumé documentaire — langue originale

Divine Continuity Corpus — Version 1.0 The Universal Covenant of Sacred Life, Humanity, Peace, and Recoverable Futures Author: Noelia SanchezAffiliation: Interval StudioFramework: Continuity Science / Recoverability-Constrained Systems The Divine Continuity Corpus is an integrated ethical, spiritual, philosophical, constitutional, and interdisciplinary research collection developed from the Noelia Sanchez / Interval Studio Continuity Science and Recoverability-Constrained Systems corpus. This first unified edition brings together sacred-language interpretations, universal human protections, peaceful coexistence principles, living-system frameworks, constitutional proposals, recoverability mathematics, and interdisciplinary continuity architectures. Its central proposition is that the protection of life, dignity, identity, legitimate agency, and future possibility must remain fundamental wherever decisions, technologies, institutions, or civilizations can produce material or irreversible consequences. The corpus integrates nine interconnected dimensions: Sacred Life and Universal Dignity — Protection of human worth independent of recognition, belief, status, origin, ability, or institutional classification. Freedom of Conscience and Peaceful Coexistence — Protection against persecution, coercion, discrimination, and identity-based violence across religions, political perspectives, genders, cultures, and civilizations. Humanity, Family, and Collective Care — Responsibilities of parents, guardians, communities, caregivers, institutions, and successors. Truth, Evidence, and Accountability — Preservation of truthful distinctions, provenance, independent review, correction, and responsibility. Living Systems and Future Generations — Stewardship of biological life, ecosystems, water, infrastructure, resources, and intergenerational continuity. Technology and Recoverability — Ethical governance of artificial intelligence, automation, computation, communication, healthcare technologies, and future-developed systems. Justice, Restoration, and Reconciliation — Prevention of avoidable harm, protection of vulnerable beings, accessible remedies, restitution, and voluntary reconciliation. Universal Governance and Civilizational Continuity — Proposed constitutional principles, accountable institutions, peaceful relations, and protections against domination or exploitation. Recursive Stewardship and the Zero-Distinction Boundary — Governance of governance, preservation of materially relevant distinctions, and recognition of the limits of operational knowledge. The collection contains original source documents, thematic spiritual adaptations, proposed ethical and constitutional instruments, historical source versions, concordances, editorial registers, and provenance records. Spiritual language is presented as an original interpretive and ethical framework, not as verified divine revelation or as the authoritative teaching of any religious tradition. Scientific, philosophical, hypothetical, and normative statements remain distinguishable. The Zero-Distinction Boundary represents a formal limit of operational expression, not proof of a supernatural ontology. The corpus is intended to support interdisciplinary scholarship, ethical dialogue, human-rights-oriented governance development, educational interpretation, and further research into recoverability, continuity, responsibility, and the preservation of future possibilities. Edition: Version 1.0 — First Unified Edition. Status: Proposed research and ethical framework. Its constitutional provisions are models for consideration and do not constitute enacted or ratified law.

Identifiants

OPENALEX

https://openalex.org/W7222977655

DOI

10.5281/zenodo.23463515

Repères documentaires

Famille documentaire

Rapport — provenance institutionnelle à préciser

Types déclarés par les sources

report

Les mentions d’entités ne constituent pas une preuve de reconnaissance juridique. La juridiction étudiée est distincte du pays d’affiliation des auteurs.

Sources

OpenAlex · Document 1

• Document · https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23463515

Statut documentaire

Pertinence à examiner

Bibliothèque

Cette identité n’est pas encore intégrée à la Bibliothèque juridique.