UDTR Global Rights of Nature Radar

Unplanning Research with a Curious Practice Methodology: Emergence of Childrenforest in the Context of Finland

Identification

Public canonical key

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-67286-1_25

Authors

—

Reported year

2018

Reported language

en · eng

Source type

Part of book or chapter of book

First detected

2026-11-09T19:10:41.145471+00:00

Last metadata observation

2026-11-09T19:10:41.145471+00:00

Last HTTP verification

Not checked

Documentary abstract — original language

Abstract This chapter explores the notion of curious practice and the methodology of its application in the context of primary school education in Finland. The concept of curious practice encourages us — researchers and educators — to ask “How does curious practice help us to address children’s relations to forests beyond the child (in) nature dualism?” Curious practice challenges the existing environmental education methodologies employed in recent years that draw heavily on research planning, the child’s representation of nature, and the results of a completed study. Despret’s (Domesticating practices: The case of Arabian Babblers. In G. Marvin and S. McHugh (Eds.), Routledge handbook of human–animal studies (pp. 23–38). New York: Routledge, 2014) approach of curious practice encourages researchers to unplan and make themselves available to the yet unknown, for every single encounter with the other is a mixture of unpredictability, the researcher’s attentiveness, and imagination. The rationale behind curious practice is in learning more about what is seen and heard via questioning the encounters that accept various absences of a preconceived framework of research. As a necessary complement to such a methodology, the chapter also presents a semiotic approach, employed by Eduardo Kohn (How forests think: Toward an anthropology beyond the human. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2013), to inform the method of studying the logic of the world beyond human symbolism. The data used reveal an interdependency of children and forests that will be referred to as childrenforest in that it continuously generates a network of signs which adults and children themselves often are unable to access or represent. These present absences found in curious practice are crucial for our understanding of what we have overlooked while claiming that the other is known. With that, however, childrenforest cannot be fully grasped. Andrew Pickering’s (Natures Sciences Sociétés, 1(21), 77–83, 2013) notion of islands of stability is utilized to elaborate the ways that childrenforests signal the presence of the seemingly stable configurations of their dynamic becoming. The chapter concludes with a short discussion of the potential areas of curious practice application beyond the ethological and childhood research.

Identifiers

DOI

10.1007/978-3-319-67286-1_25

OPENAIRE

doi_dedup___::98c3afd98f95f7581c103502d0bc37f9

Documentary context

Documentary family

Book chapter

Source-reported types

Part of book or chapter of book

Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources

FI

Natural entities mentioned

Forest

Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.

Book bibliographic description

Access status unknown

Sources

OpenAIRE · Record 1

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67286-1_25

Documentary status

Relevance pending

Library

This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.