UDTR Global Rights of Nature Radar

Reactive justice: how FIFA and CAS co-construct child protection in football

Identification

Public canonical key

doi:10.1007/s40318-026-00338-y

Authors

Sahra Simay Günalp

Reported year

2026

Reported language

en

Source type

article

First detected

2026-11-09T19:04:47.823113+00:00

Last metadata observation

2026-11-09T19:04:47.823113+00:00

Last HTTP verification

Not checked

Institutions reported by the source

KU Leuven · Norwegian School of Sport Sciences

Reported affiliation countries

BE · NO

Documentary abstract — original language

Abstract This article critically examines the evolution of FIFA’s ( Fédération Internationale de Football Association ) regulatory framework on the protection of minors, focusing on Article 19 of the Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players (RSTP) and its interpretation by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS). Employing a doctrinal legal analysis of Article 19 of the FIFA RSTP since 2001 and CAS jurisprudence between 2001 and 2022, this article traces the evolution of key exceptions such as parental-move, European Union (EU) or European Economic Area (EEA), cross-border transfers, humanitarian grounds, and academy regulation and situates these developments within the normative framework of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC). The findings reveal that Article 19, introduced in 2001 as a restrictive measure to combat trafficking and exploitation, has developed through a series of reactive reforms driven by public developments, disciplinary actions, and judicial interventions rather than by a coherent child-protection strategy. Across diverse strands of CAS jurisprudence, panels have gradually incorporated child-rights reasoning and, at times, urged FIFA to amend its rules. Yet FIFA’s selective implementation of such reasoning has reinforced structural imbalances within its regulatory framework. Limited transparency and significant access-to-justice barriers further constrain the effective protection of minors in global football. The article argues that a more systematic integration of UNCRC principles into FIFA’s regulatory architecture, combined with enhanced transparency, improved access to adjudicatory mechanisms, and the incorporation of child-rights expertise within CAS proceedings, is essential to shift from reactive adaptation toward a proactive, rights-sensitive model of global football governance.

Identifiers

OPENALEX

W7161631588

DOI

10.1007/s40318-026-00338-y

Documentary context

Documentary family

Scholarship

Source-reported types

article

Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.

Sources

OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.1007/s40318-026-00338-y
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W7161631588

Documented bibliographic relations

Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.

• openalex:w1495520536 · CITES
• openalex:w2158786662 · CITES
• openalex:w2801549190 · CITES
• openalex:w2890965204 · CITES
• openalex:w2946772290 · CITES
• openalex:w2972254080 · CITES
• openalex:w2996033310 · CITES
• openalex:w4211109075 · CITES
• openalex:w4232122054 · CITES
• openalex:w4281985873 · CITES
• openalex:w4309408460 · CITES
• openalex:w4313584204 · CITES
• openalex:w4386036667 · CITES
• openalex:w4387348836 · CITES
• openalex:w4399454533 · CITES
• openalex:w4400204714 · CITES
• openalex:w4406115890 · CITES
• openalex:w4409677532 · CITES
• openalex:w4415629051 · CITES
• openalex:w650994234 · CITES

0 incoming references within the detected corpus

Documentary status

Relevance pending

Library

This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.