UDTR Global Rights of Nature Radar

ノスタルジアと絶滅のナラティヴ : ポピュラー・サイエンスとポストモダン小説

Identification

Public canonical key

radar:r-eacb4a9a69aaa0c375c53c55ff495a24

Authors

—

Reported year

—

Reported language

en · eng

Source type

Article

First detected

2026-11-09T19:10:37.333667+00:00

Last metadata observation

2026-11-09T19:10:37.333667+00:00

Last HTTP verification

Not checked

Documentary abstract — original language

“Now nature—tamed, endangered, mortal—needs to be protected frompeople” (15), writes Susan Sontag in her book of essays, On Photography.Even though this book of essays was published in 1977, originally it began asa single article titled “Photography,” which was coincidentally published inthe same year when the Endangered Species Act of 1973 was passed. Sontagcontinues, “When we are afraid, we shoot. But when we are nostalgic, wetake pictures” (15). For Sontag, nostalgia provokes us to take pictures, and“photographs actively promote nostalgia” (15). What interests me here andin the following discussion is how deeply and paradoxically nostalgia isrelated to the act of depicting environmental phenomena during and after thepostmodern period.In her recent book titled The Future of Nostalgia, Svetlana Boymobserves how Vladimir Nabokov was conscious of the interrelationshipbetween nostalgia and the representation of nature. In his memoirs, Nabokovdescribes an aging swan, which is a sign of death, as “dodo-like.” Boymexplains:By describing his bird as “dodo-like” Nabokov interrupts all the clichésand poetic references to the swans of other time. The detail turns thepredictable swan into a creature of individual memory and anticipatorynostalgia. (280)This “anticipatory nostalgia” is a particular nostalgia for “somethingthat hasn’t happened yet” (280). It is very much like Sontag’s nostalgia,and the image of the dodo is one of the most suitable motifs for studyingthe paradoxical relationship between nostalgia and the act of depictingenvironmental phenomena in the extinction narratives of popular sciencewriters and postmodern novelists.In contrast to the ecological narratives of Darwinian writings, such asStephen Jay Gould’s essays and David Quammen’s The Song of the Dodo(1996), which revel in environmental ethics, the anti-Darwinian or parodicnarratives of the postmodernists, such as Kurt Vonnegut’s Slaughterhouse-Five (1969) and Thomas Pynchon’s Gravity’s Rainbow (1973), whichobsessively deal with the extinctions of homo sapiens and the other species,never connect environmental phenomena with ethics. In this paper, however,I will not argue that there is a serious gap between the extinction narratives ofscientists and postmodernists. I will, rather, emphasize the common groundamong their narratives. identifier:104901

Identifiers

OPENAIRE

jairo_______::363523b32b4b93a932147bec16d937fc

Documentary context

Documentary family

Scholarship

Source-reported types

Article

Natural entities mentioned

Species

Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.

Sources

OpenAIRE

Direct documentary source pending consolidation

Documentary status

Relevance pending

Library

This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.