Guardians of Digital Rights: Exploring Strategic Litigation on Data Protection and Content Moderation in the EU
Identification
- Public canonical key
- radar:r-e944bc4aa11fee6f859981485a5d57b7
- Authors
- Valentina Golunova · Sarah Tas
- Reported year
- 2025
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-14T02:39:07.394156+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-14T02:39:07.394156+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
Maastricht University
Reported affiliation countries
NL
Documentary abstract — original language
Civil society actors play an increasingly prominent role in the protection of digital rights in the EU. Strategic litigation against Big Tech companies is one of the crucial means of furthering their objectives. This article seeks to critically analyse and compare strategic litigation efforts against tech companies with respect to data protection and content moderation. It argues that while the recourse to judicial action by civil society actors varies significantly in different areas of EU digital policy, the recent evolution of the EU regulatory framework on digital services and representative actions is expected to facilitate both strategic litigation and non-judicial means of advocating digital rights. The article begins by emphasising the importance of strategic litigation in fostering accountability of Big Tech. It then examines the legal framework and examples of strategic lawsuits concerning two key practices affecting the exercise of fundamental rights in the digital domain: personal data processing and content moderation. While the article highlights a steadily growing number of data protection cases brought by civil society actors, it also underscores the scarcity of legal actions challenging inadequate or disproportionate moderation practices. Having established this discrepancy, the paper proceeds to explore possible reasons for it by drawing on the literature on legal mobilisation. In doing so, it considers both legal and political opportunities underpinning strategic litigation efforts of civil society actors. In conclusion, the paper reflects on the prospects of strategic litigation of digital rights in the EU.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- https://openalex.org/W4407006545
- DOI
- 10.36969/njel.v7i4.27306
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- article
- Source-reported types
- article
- Publishers
- Lund University
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAlex · Record 1
Cite this reference
Valentina Golunova; Sarah Tas. Guardians of Digital Rights: Exploring Strategic Litigation on Data Protection and Content Moderation in the EU. 2025. https://doi.org/10.36969/njel.v7i4.27306
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Valentina Golunova; Sarah Tas. (2025). Guardians of Digital Rights: Exploring Strategic Litigation on Data Protection and Content Moderation in the EU. https://doi.org/10.36969/njel.v7i4.27306
- Chicago
- Valentina Golunova; Sarah Tas. Guardians of Digital Rights: Exploring Strategic Litigation on Data Protection and Content Moderation in the EU. 2025. https://doi.org/10.36969/njel.v7i4.27306
- ISO 690
- Valentina Golunova; Sarah Tas. Guardians of Digital Rights: Exploring Strategic Litigation on Data Protection and Content Moderation in the EU. 2025. https://doi.org/10.36969/njel.v7i4.27306
Warning: Undefined array key "last_link_verified" in /home/clients/e27d81e12f04d2bfd747aa264540ac56/sites/_UDTR_APP/legal_library_reference.php on line 31
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Guardians of Digital Rights: Exploring Strategic Litigation on Data Protection and Content Moderation in the EU. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-e944bc4aa11fee6f859981485a5d57b7/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Research dossiers and documentary relations
Source roles
Bibliographic / original publication source · https://doi.org/10.36969/njel.v7i4.27306
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.