Between Skepticism and Uncritical Acceptance – How an Optimal Level of Trust in Artificial Intelligence Can Ease the Burden on Healthcare
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.5771/2701-4193-2025-2-143
- Authors
- Florian Zimmermann · Svenja Pelgrim · Andi Hamza
- Reported year
- 2025
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:10:05.536740+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:10:05.536740+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Documentary abstract — original language
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a key driver of the ongoing transformation in healthcare. It can support physicians in making diagnoses and help reduce medical errors. Studies indicate that the correct use of AI enhances the efficiency and performance of healthcare systems, thereby alleviating the burden on medical professionals, improving access to healthcare for all social groups, and strengthening public welfare. At the same time, many physicians exhibit limited trust in AI, preventing the full realization of its potential. However, excessive trust in AI also poses risks, such as the uncritical adoption of erroneous medical recommendations. In this context, this paper explores how an appropriate level of trust in AI can be established to optimize its performance while mitigating risks, ultimately contributing to a sustainable improvement in healthcare.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W4412141192
- DOI
- 10.5771/2701-4193-2025-2-143
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Scholarship
- Source-reported types
- article
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Not recorded
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Florian Zimmermann; Svenja Pelgrim; Andi Hamza. Between Skepticism and Uncritical Acceptance – How an Optimal Level of Trust in Artificial Intelligence Can Ease the Burden on Healthcare. 2025. https://doi.org/10.5771/2701-4193-2025-2-143
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Florian Zimmermann; Svenja Pelgrim; Andi Hamza. (2025). Between Skepticism and Uncritical Acceptance – How an Optimal Level of Trust in Artificial Intelligence Can Ease the Burden on Healthcare. https://doi.org/10.5771/2701-4193-2025-2-143
- Chicago
- Florian Zimmermann; Svenja Pelgrim; Andi Hamza. Between Skepticism and Uncritical Acceptance – How an Optimal Level of Trust in Artificial Intelligence Can Ease the Burden on Healthcare. 2025. https://doi.org/10.5771/2701-4193-2025-2-143
- ISO 690
- Florian Zimmermann; Svenja Pelgrim; Andi Hamza. Between Skepticism and Uncritical Acceptance – How an Optimal Level of Trust in Artificial Intelligence Can Ease the Burden on Healthcare. 2025. https://doi.org/10.5771/2701-4193-2025-2-143
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Between Skepticism and Uncritical Acceptance – How an Optimal Level of Trust in Artificial Intelligence Can Ease the Burden on Healthcare. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-e6b44dfc0ac4ba273043cacda2edcb9a/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version bed0382fd0b1057d · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:05.536740+00:00
- Authors
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:05.536740+00:00
- Year
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:05.536740+00:00
- Identifiers
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:05.536740+00:00
- Source URL
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:05.536740+00:00
- Source-reported author ORCID
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:05.536740+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
668422f2bf0efadf · 2026-11-09T19:10:05.536740+00:00
2c5224b0ba227dfd · 2026-11-09T19:10:05.536740+00:00
75e4a8130aa3a6b7 · 2026-11-09T19:10:05.536740+00:00
bed0382fd0b1057d · 2026-11-09T19:10:05.536740+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
Source roles
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.5771/2701-4193-2025-2-143
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W4412141192
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.