CONFLICTS IN THE USE OF FOREST LAND IN MANITOBA AND SASKATCHEWAN
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.5558/tfc39026-1
- Authors
- S. W. Schortinghuis
- Reported year
- 1963
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:14:22.162044+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:14:22.162044+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
Government of Manitoba
Documentary abstract — original language
While my paper makes reference to conditions in Manitoba and Saskatchewan, my approach to this subject is not deliberately kept on a regional basis, although of course it is based on experience gained and conditions found in this part of Canada.The use and administration of all land involves a great deal of compromise by all concerned.As our society and economy become more complex over the years, land use also must become more complex.Simple arrangements which sufficed in the past no longer can apply without modification.Privately owned forest land is a case in point.This is not a big problem in Manitoba and Saskatchewan, where most forest lands are publicly owned and where the proper care and management of patented forest lands is not economically attractive.Therefore the old concept of noninterference with the owner's action on his own land is being very largely followed today, including his right to remove the forest cover even where this results in erosion problems, as sometimes it does.Therefore, the most direct action usually taken is that the government buys such lands and many tens of thousands of acres have been bought.This still leaves much uncared for and under-productive private and Crown-controlled lands.At this time there is very little demand for tillage use of forest lands in Manitoba and Saskatchewan.It is not anticipated that there will be serious conflict between arable and forest use of land in the future because of soil surveys, land classifications, ARDA and the fact that forest soils, unless of desirable texture, good drainage, etc. are not as acceptable to farmers today as they were before the problems with them were known.Today and in the immediate future the conflicts between forestry and agriculture are conflicts in respect to grazing and forestry.The dramatic increase in livestock numbers requires more grazing and hay lands.Some rather marginal forest lands have been converted to pasture in community, association and private pastures.This is not a serious situation as far as forest utilization is concerned.The forests involved have mostly important watershed rather than productive values.The administration of community pastures at least is by trained conservationists.A more important conflict in this field, especially with erosion control, is with individual farmers and ranchers who exert a great deal of pressure for maximum grazing rights on forest lands and are often irresponsible in the use of fire and lack of initiative in improving their holdings and preventing erosion.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W2018989407
- DOI
- 10.5558/tfc39026-1
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Scholarship
- Source-reported types
- article
- Natural entities mentioned
- Forest · Watershed
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Not recorded
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
S. W. Schortinghuis. CONFLICTS IN THE USE OF FOREST LAND IN MANITOBA AND SASKATCHEWAN. 1963. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc39026-1
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- S. W. Schortinghuis. (1963). CONFLICTS IN THE USE OF FOREST LAND IN MANITOBA AND SASKATCHEWAN. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc39026-1
- Chicago
- S. W. Schortinghuis. CONFLICTS IN THE USE OF FOREST LAND IN MANITOBA AND SASKATCHEWAN. 1963. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc39026-1
- ISO 690
- S. W. Schortinghuis. CONFLICTS IN THE USE OF FOREST LAND IN MANITOBA AND SASKATCHEWAN. 1963. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc39026-1
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. CONFLICTS IN THE USE OF FOREST LAND IN MANITOBA AND SASKATCHEWAN. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-e64ef84882e9582b811cf044e6fc0cb0/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version e2140414e9e7d26e · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:14:22.162044+00:00
- Authors
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:14:22.162044+00:00
- Year
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:14:22.162044+00:00
- Identifiers
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:14:22.162044+00:00
- Source URL
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:14:22.162044+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
62c5b453902d1afb · 2026-11-09T19:14:22.162044+00:00
18ed6c91052bc7c3 · 2026-11-09T19:14:22.162044+00:00
d874b8d6a7594f16 · 2026-11-09T19:14:22.162044+00:00
e2140414e9e7d26e · 2026-11-09T19:14:22.162044+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
Source roles
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc39026-1
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W2018989407
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.