La naturaleza como sujeto de derechos y su interpretación constitucional: interculturalidad y cosmovisión de los pueblos originarios (Tema Central)
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.32719/26312484.2020.34.3
- Authors
- Amilcar Alexander · Alan Osvaldo
- Reported year
- 2020
- Reported language
- es · spa
- Source type
- Other ORP type
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:04:47.562539+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:08:51.215543+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
Universidad Católica de Cuenca · Universidad Católica de Cuenca, Ecuador · Universidad Internacional SEK · Universidad Internacional SEK (UISEK), Ecuador
Reported affiliation countries
EC
Documentary abstract — original language
El presente artículo contribuye a la construcción de un método constitucional que considere al principio del sumak kawsay y sus elementos en la interpretación de la naturaleza como sujeto de derechos, tanto en la jurisprudencia como en la deóntica jurídica. De esta forma, se plantea a la interculturalidad como fundamento de una epistemología que amalgame las diversas cosmovisiones que conjuga la Constitución. Por lo tanto, en un primer momento, se abordará la relación sumak kawsay-naturaleza, exponiendo las nociones que, desde la cosmovisión indígena, fundamentan su reconocimiento como sujeto de derechos. Posteriormente, se analizará la especial relación que los pueblos libres o en aislamiento voluntario tienen con la naturaleza, aproximándonos a su cosmovisión a fin de incorporar su enfoque en la hermenéutica constitucional. Finalmente, como corolario, se enfatiza en la dimensión pragmática de la interpretación intercultural y su relevancia en el paradigma constitucional ecuatoriano. This article contributes to the construction of a constitutional method that I considers about sumak kawsay rule and its elements in the interpretation of nature as a subject of rights, both in jurisprudence and legal ethics. In this way, interculturality is considered as the foundation of an epistemology that amalgamates the various worldviews that conjugates the Constitution. Therefore, at first, will be approached the sumak kawsay-nature relationship, exposing the notions that, from the indigenous worldview, base its recognition as a rights subject. Subsequently, will be analyzed the special relationship that free people or voluntary isolation peoples have with nature, approaching their worldview in order to incorporate their focus on constitutional hermeneutics. Finally, as a corollary, the pragmatic dimension of intercultural interpretation and its relevance in the Ecuadorian constitutional paradigm is emphasized.
Identifiers
- OPENAIRE
- doi_dedup___::fd10a4e2fb806e79880a7948cce252c2 · od______3056::da3819e2bab4dce5370084db32b903c8
- DOI
- 10.32719/26312484.2020.34.3
- OPENALEX
- W4251930792
- HANDLE
- 10644/7509
- ISSN
- 1390-2466 · 2631-2484
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Other
- Source-reported types
- Article · Other ORP type · article
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAIRE · Record 1 · Record 2
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2 · Record 3
- DOI · https://doi.org/10.32719/26312484.2020.34.3
- Document · http://hdl.handle.net/10644/7509
- Handle · https://hdl.handle.net/10644/7509
- Document · https://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/foro/article/view/1460/1285
- OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W4251930792
Documented bibliographic relations
Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.
30 incoming references within the detected corpus
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Not recorded
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Amilcar Alexander; Alan Osvaldo. La naturaleza como sujeto de derechos y su interpretación constitucional: interculturalidad y cosmovisión de los pueblos originarios (Tema Central). 2020. https://doi.org/10.32719/26312484.2020.34.3
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Amilcar Alexander; Alan Osvaldo. (2020). La naturaleza como sujeto de derechos y su interpretación constitucional: interculturalidad y cosmovisión de los pueblos originarios (Tema Central). https://doi.org/10.32719/26312484.2020.34.3
- Chicago
- Amilcar Alexander; Alan Osvaldo. La naturaleza como sujeto de derechos y su interpretación constitucional: interculturalidad y cosmovisión de los pueblos originarios (Tema Central). 2020. https://doi.org/10.32719/26312484.2020.34.3
- ISO 690
- Amilcar Alexander; Alan Osvaldo. La naturaleza como sujeto de derechos y su interpretación constitucional: interculturalidad y cosmovisión de los pueblos originarios (Tema Central). 2020. https://doi.org/10.32719/26312484.2020.34.3
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. La naturaleza como sujeto de derechos y su interpretación constitucional: interculturalidad y cosmovisión de los pueblos originarios (Tema Central). Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-e4400634fc9cdceaa98e863184dc57cf/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version 0facc0db86d24ae4 · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- DOAJ · source · 2026-11-09T19:05:01.476877+00:00
OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:07:22.145191+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Authors
- DOAJ · source · 2026-11-09T19:05:01.476877+00:00
OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:07:22.145191+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Year
- DOAJ · source · 2026-11-09T19:05:01.476877+00:00
OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:07:22.145191+00:00 - Identifiers
- DOAJ · source · 2026-11-09T19:05:01.476877+00:00
OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:07:22.145191+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Source URL
- DOAJ · source · 2026-11-09T19:05:01.476877+00:00
OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:07:22.145191+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained.
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
beb022162115faf0 · 2026-11-09T19:08:51.215543+00:00
aecba8cc4b95634e · 2026-11-09T19:08:51.215543+00:00
5e229a69939cfab2 · 2026-11-09T19:08:51.215543+00:00
0facc0db86d24ae4 · 2026-11-09T19:08:51.215543+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
Universidad Católica de Cuenca
Source roles
Bibliographic / original publication source · https://doi.org/10.32719/26312484.2020.34.3
Discovery source · http://hdl.handle.net/10644/7509
Discovery source · https://hdl.handle.net/10644/7509
Bibliographic / original publication source · https://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/foro/article/view/1460/1285
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W4251930792
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Documentary validated