UDTR Global Rights of Nature Radar

LEGAL PROTECTION OF THE CUSTOMARY RIGHTS OF THE RIMBA PEOPLE IN JAMBI PROVINCE

Identification

Public canonical key

doi:10.54443/ijerlas.v5i6.4907

Authors

Irfan Hafiyyansah · I Nyoman Nurajaya · Herlindah

Reported year

2026

Reported language

en

Source type

article

First detected

2026-11-09T19:19:50.286935+00:00

Last metadata observation

2026-11-09T19:19:50.286935+00:00

Last HTTP verification

Not checked

Institutions reported by the source

University of Brawijaya

Documentary abstract — original language

The state recognizes and protects Indigenous Law Communities (MHA) and their traditional rights in the constitution. One of the traditional rights held by MHA is customary rights. Some communities in Indonesia still live in groups and depend on the land/environment they recognize as customary rights. One of the Indigenous Law Communities is the Orang Rimba. The Orang Rimba live inside and outside forest areas, some of them still practice a semi-hunting-gathering culture and wander in the forest which they recognize as their living space. This study aims to examine the urgency of protecting the customary rights of the Orang Rimba and the implementation of the protection of their customary rights. Both issues are reviewed in normative juridical research, based on a set of regulations related to the recognition of MHA and customary rights that are still in effect in Indonesia. From the research conducted, it was found that the government has not fully provided legal protection for the customary rights of the Orang Rimba. The solution offered is a partnership agreement for area management and relocation of Orang Rimba settlements through the Remote Indigenous Community program.

Identifiers

OPENALEX

W7215965243

DOI

10.54443/ijerlas.v5i6.4907

Documentary context

Documentary family

Scholarship

Source-reported types

article

Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources

ID

Natural entities mentioned

Forest

Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.

Sources

OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2 · Record 3

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.54443/ijerlas.v5i6.4907
• Document · https://radjapublika.com/index.php/IJERLAS/article/view/4907
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W7215965243

Documented bibliographic relations

Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.

• openalex:w3211603023 · CITES

0 incoming references within the detected corpus

Documentary status

Relevance pending

Library

This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.